That's a model. Still looks cool though.Far surpassed by better designs,the Allison engine seemed to be pretty good at low to medium altitude. Not great higher up but it was adequate for it's purposes in it's day.
View attachment 297656
I think part of it might have been a torque issue as well. The JuMo used was the one used in the 111’s, Ju-88’s, etc. a bomber engine, so it had the punch to turn a big paddle prop at a slower RPM, maybe?The DBs have only been rebuildable in recent times. Rolls rebuilt one many years ago for one of the English Mes and told them don't ever trash the crankshaft because they couldn't rebuild it ( don't know why ). Apparently the specialty shops like Vintage V12s have "relearned" the DBs.
That fuel injection pump is a real amazing piece of work. Conversely, all but the very last DBs had an inherent assymetric cooling issue and as a consequence had to run a lower compression ratio on one of the cylinder blocks. Weird !
I've always questioned the issue with the Jumo powered Mes. The Jumo is virtually. the same weight as the DB, makes me think the real issue may have been a change in cg due to mounting difference ? Seems like a pretty elementary design mistake if that is the case.
Fantastic !!!! I envy youWe got invited next Friday to a night check-run of one of Vintage V-12's Rolls-Royce Griffon engines.
https://vintagev12s.com/
The last test run on one of their rebuilds is done at night since you can SEE stuff that gets missed during a daylight run. We will be taking videos! - pic of a Merlin from their website: View attachment 298321
We are allowed to be around the engine when running so it's pretty cool! Will take some video and stills.Fantastic !!!! I envy you
Please keep us posted - thank you !
When a prop turns it's because the plane applies torque to the prop. Newton tells us the prop applies a torque to the plane in response. If the props turn opposite directions the torque on the plane cancels out. If they turn the same direction, the torque on the plane is the sum of the two.From the looks of the propeller, the engines rotated in the same directions. I know that induces some uncomfortable characteristics while flying and maneuvering. IIRC, the Brits seemed to not worry about counter revolving engines, most likely a wartime contingency. I believe all of the U.S. multi engines had them. But I could be wrong.
Went aboard that bird when she showed up at an airshow in Groton, CT.Here are a couple youtube vids of the HE-111 That was powered by 2x rolls royce msrlins because 2 DBs were not functionally available.
I saw this plane numerous times at shows,went inside it,have pics of interior and me with it. Was great. It was Francos transport far as i know.
I forgave the engine fopaw and just enjoyed seeing it fly. Sitting in that glazed noae made you feel very exposed but great visibility.
I donated to help with getting the 2 DBs rebuilt so it would be right... then it crashed in 2003. Horrible loss all around, dont remember the cause.
And
If it's the one I'm thinking about it was based in Arizona and was going up to Seattle? And had an engine failure.one of my friends brother was the pilot when it crashed, one engine failed if i remember correctly.