The FAL Files

The FAL Files (https://www.falfiles.com/forums/index.php)
-   Optics (https://www.falfiles.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=133)
-   -   Optic on handguard? (https://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=443557)

Medic956 July 30, 2019 18:19

Optic on handguard?
 
Forgive me if this is addressed (I'm surprised I didn't find a thread from searching), but do any of you know if the VLTOR handguard or the DSA MLOK handguard will hold zero? I'm wanting to mount a red-dot and light with just one part.

If this is addressed elsewhere with some results, please just direct me there.

Medic956 July 31, 2019 07:32

Really? Nobody?

W.E.G. July 31, 2019 08:46

Very few folks who buy that sort of gimmicky accessory, and mount it on FAL, have enough experience actually shooting it a lot over any length of time to have an opinion worthy of trust.

A sight mounted on a handguard is only as good as the attachment to the rifle. I would have serious reservations about the reliability of any handguard-mounted sight that relies on attachment to a conventional-configuration FAL barrel.

Medic956 July 31, 2019 10:33

I find it strange that you consider the idea gimmicky, as the ultimak mounts to the barrel and sometimes results in improved accuracy in AKs (which is certainly not common). It's not the same attachment, but running optics on forearms isn't novel or unusual really.

W.E.G. July 31, 2019 11:33

It may be "accurate enough" for your application if you are citing usage on an AK as evidence of the utility of the application.

Having seen how these install on a FAL, it wouldn't be suitable for the type of shooting I do that utilizes an optic. But then, even a well-mounted optic on a FAL isn't suitable for my regular flavor of shooting.

If wandering zeros of more than a minute of angle are acceptable, it might work OK for some applications until it vibrates loose.

ByronF July 31, 2019 18:22

I dont mount optics on floating AR15 rails. Sure wouldnt have any faith in an FAL handguard rail. If you want a 9 pound 7.62 CQB-only rifle (for some reason) it may be OK.

The mechanics just dont get the job done. The best top cover rail mount still leaves something to be desired. Battle rifle precise but nowhere close to MOA.

nvcdl July 31, 2019 19:01

I'm planning on testing a red dot on the AIM M-Lok handguard one of these days. It seems to me that it may be a more reliable mounting point then using the dustcover. Eye relief may or may not be the determining factor.

Medic956 July 31, 2019 20:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.G. (Post 4766737)
It may be "accurate enough" for your application if you are citing usage on an AK as evidence of the utility of the application.

Having seen how these install on a FAL, it wouldn't be suitable for the type of shooting I do that utilizes an optic. But then, even a well-mounted optic on a FAL isn't suitable for my regular flavor of shooting.

If wandering zeros of more than a minute of angle are acceptable, it might work OK for some applications until it vibrates loose.

So you've mounted it and it wandered a lot? I'm not looking for precision work, if I was I wouldn't be using a FAL. All I need is about 2-3 MOA (which btw, I can do with my AK rather easily).

Medic956 July 31, 2019 20:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by ByronF (Post 4766972)
I dont mount optics on floating AR15 rails. Sure wouldnt have any faith in an FAL handguard rail. If you want a 9 pound 7.62 CQB-only rifle (for some reason) it may be OK.

The mechanics just dont get the job done. The best top cover rail mount still leaves something to be desired. Battle rifle precise but nowhere close to MOA.

I'm not an old man, but my eyes like a dot a lot better than irons in anything less than nice bright light. Do you not use a dot past 200?

ByronF July 31, 2019 20:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medic956 (Post 4767080)
I'm not an old man, but my eyes like a dot a lot better than irons in anything less than nice bright light. Do you not use a dot past 200?

I do use red dot at further ranges sometimes. It works fine if on a solid mount. The FAL hanguard is not a solid mount.. It will work as a 10 MOA CQB optic, I predict. And 10 MOA is OK for CQB.

W.E.G. July 31, 2019 20:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medic956 (Post 4767077)
So you've mounted it and it wandered a lot?

I never said I ever owned one.

I have seen them. I see how they are mounted. I don't need to own an Amish wagon to know its a primitive tool, with obvious limitations. But, if its your style, I'm OK with you doing what works for you.

tac-40 August 01, 2019 19:47

An FAL dust cover mount, at least one of the good ones, is a pretty solid mount when installed correctly. Way better than a forearm that is fastened at one point and allowed to move everywhere else along its length. I have a para with an ARM railed dust cover mount and it is fine for minute of man out to 300 yards with my EoTech on it. Haven't tried it farther so can't comment there.

A red dot mounted significantly away from the eye will cause the parallax to be more significant in getting and holding a good sight picture and hitting the target. While most RDS companies say there is no parallax on their optics, there really is and it can come into play. I know this because I worked as a government funded contractor a few years back evaluating various RDS optics for law enforcement use and found out that parallax was present in every optic.

NFADLR August 01, 2019 20:20

You admit driving a buckboard with a team of oxen to the waffle hut ohh and brought yo bitch while you at it!!

Dey ain't too great on cobble stone roads either..


Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.G. (Post 4767096)
I never said I ever owned one.

I have seen them. I see how they are mounted. I don't need to own an Amish wagon to know its a primitive tool, with obvious limitations. But, if its your style, I'm OK with you doing what works for you.


moonbat60 August 13, 2019 20:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by tac-40 (Post 4767588)
An FAL dust cover mount, at least one of the good ones, is a pretty solid mount when installed correctly. Way better than a forearm that is fastened at one point and allowed to move everywhere else along its length. I have a para with an ARM railed dust cover mount and it is fine for minute of man out to 300 yards with my EoTech on it. Haven't tried it farther so can't comment there.

A red dot mounted significantly away from the eye will cause the parallax to be more significant in getting and holding a good sight picture and hitting the target. While most RDS companies say there is no parallax on their optics, there really is and it can come into play. I know this because I worked as a government funded contractor a few years back evaluating various RDS optics for law enforcement use and found out that parallax was present in every optic.

I agree. I only got two guns with optics mounted forward, one being a Marlin 1895 Guide Gun in .45-70 and the other is a Benelli S90 shotgun.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2019 The FAL Files