![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Curio & Relic
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 4305 Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,339
|
Marking a Home Built Firearm
I know there are no requirements from the ATFE for marking a homemade firearm, only the recommendation in the event of it being stolen.
However, ordered some of the recent Century castings. They are already marked with every pertinent bit of info except the serial number. The are marked with the model -- R1A1 Sporter-- and the caliber -- .308 -- and they are marked from Century Arms. Q: How would someone disinguish a home completed casting from a Century made and serialed casting? Follow on Q: Is there a regulation that keeps a homebuilder from mimicking of even duplicating the markings of a licensed manufacturer?
__________________
--David |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 6260 Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Clay Center, NE
Posts: 4,241
|
well I am certianly no expert, but, I believe that Century and all other manufacturers are required to maintain a serial number list along with whom they sold the gun/receiver to.
As for duplicating manufacturers markings, in the first place why would you want to?? IMHO, if I were talented enough to make my own parts and pieces, I would want the whole durn world to know that I DID IT!!! I also suspect, but dont know for sure, that there may be some "trademark" issues Hope this helpful and correct
__________________
Trust in the LORD with all your heart, mind and soul......... front sight, press. repeat as needed! 01 FFL :biggrin: Transfers $20 orders actual dealer + $50 Clay Center, NE |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 8095 Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 232
|
I think i may know your answer from my business.
By duplicating those markings you commit a copyright and trademark violation. In addition if you try to sell the weapon .. ever.. you are committing fraud. Fraud is something you dont want to mess with. And why the Hell would anywone want to put 'century' on anythhing.. ever? lol. Well its better than HESS i guess :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 7768 Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,452
|
If you go into the Vendor forum and look under FAC, the thread which talks about marking type 1 receivers as original G-1's will give you some idea of what to avoid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 6409 Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 161
|
xtremerange,
Quote:
I don't think it would be a good idea to try to duplicate another manufacturers markings, but if you put out all that work why would you want to? Rip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Curio & Relic
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 4305 Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,339
|
My follow on question came from an idea about 1911 frames and matching them to part kit slides, not really any nefarious motivation.
Thanks for the replies. The fraud thing is a good point that I hadn't considered, not that I was even thinking of selling things. Anyone else?
__________________
--David |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 5600 Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wichita, America
Posts: 3,259
|
As a casting It's not a firearm and any marking's on it are irrelevant. You may remove them with no manner of violation. If you don't remove the Century marking's and arbitrarily assign a number to the receiver for your record's and, forbid, something happen's such as theft or, again forbid, you defend yourself or family with it, there could be some confusion as to possible duplicity of number's (century). I'd remove the Century stuff and, if numbering it, do it after it become's a "firearm". My .02.
Doug
__________________
W. W. J. W. D? (What Would John Wayne Do) Were it not for ignorance, thus we would remain. Never hate your enemy, it only clouds your judgment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 8412 Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 28
|
When a firearm is run on NCIC to see if it is stolen, it is run by serial number. It is not uncommon for a "hit" to occur on a serial number, but the weapon entered is is not the one being run. The "hit" indicates make, model and caliber of the stolen firearm. For instance, I recently ran a Davis .22 derringer, and got a hit on a Jennings semi-auto .22 pistol.
So, lets say you stamp a serial number of 12345 on your homebrew FN FAL. It so happens that Joe Blow had a Century R1A1 stolen, serial # 12345. He tell the investigating officer that the rifle stolen is a FN FAL, so that is how it is entered in NCIC. See where I'm going with this? Lots of guns prior to 1968 didn't have serial numbers. Other than the fact that it makes recovery of said firearms more difficult if stolen, no problem. If you apply a serial number, or OAN (owner applied number) to the receiver, just make it distinct; something like your initials followed by 5 numbers followed by an Alpha suffix, like RTC11113R. Additionally, if you have removed markings from the receiver, and there is no serial number, and the receiver shows the slightest evidence of having markings removed, you may find yourself under suspicion of removing or altering a serial number on a firearm. IIRC, OAN's may not be accepted by NCIC in the event of theft, but the above procedure may prevent your rifle from being misidentified as a stolen firearm if it is ever run on the system.
__________________
"Best general purpose battle rifle that uses a detachable box magazine is the FN-FAL paratroop short rifle. Beautifully balanced, accurate, reliable and powerful, it is the author's choice." Chuck Taylor, "The Fighting Rifle: A Complete Study of the Rifle in Combat", Paladin Press, 1984 *TX-FNFAL - A Brigade of One * |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|