![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 397 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 24
|
Front Sight Pin (foresight) height on FAL & L1A1 rifles?
Were different front sight posts/heights used on StG58's?
The reason I ask is that my CAI assembled STG shoots about 8" low at 100 yards with the front sight cranked low (don't think I'm bottomed out, though). This front sight post has one dimple between the "0" and the "5", and measures (roughly) just more than 4mm from top of disk to top of post. On the other hand, a post contained in a kit I bought from Tapco has two dimples between the "0" and the "5" and seems to measure slightly less than 4mm from top of disk to top of post. Any idea as to the significance of the dimples? Are these heights I've eyeballed against a steel rule just production variances? [ August 12, 2001: Message edited by: gary.jeter ] [ August 12, 2001: Message edited by: EMDII ] |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1472 Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tempe Arizona USA
Posts: 2
|
Had the same problem. I called DS ARMS and spoke with a great guy there. Stated that there are 4 front sight posts numbered from 1 to 4. 1 being the shortest post and 4 being the longest. They are $25 each. His advise was to order the one I thought would help, a #1, or just use a file and CAREFULLY and REMOVING JUST A LITTLE MATERIAL, lower the sight. These guys were a pleasure to deal with.
------------------ Steve
__________________
Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 397 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 24
|
Thanks for the info, Steve. Have you noticed if they are numbered correspondingly? I don't have either of them out in my hands yet so I've only noticed the dimples on top. I assumed that the dimples were the coding somehow...
CAREFULLY is right!! ~Rich |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Arrogant Bastard
Gold Contributor
FALaholic #: 96 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 15,758
|
there are actually 5 sizes of austrian. ID'd by no dot, or 1-4 dots. 4 is tallest and zero is shortest.
------------------ T. Mark "Gunplumber" Graham gunplumber@arizonaresponsesystems.com Arizona Response Systems 5501 North 7th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85013 623-873-1410 http://www.arizonaresponsesystems.com
__________________
T. Mark Graham Master Gunsmith Arizona Response Systems, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
The Israeli foresight pins are numbered.
------------------ 1*.....Train Like You Fight: Second Place is NOT an Option. E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 290 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: WI
Posts: 152
|
Regarding Austrian front sight posts, 0=shortest to 4=tallest:
Anyone know what is the height difference is between the shortest and tallest, as measured on the sight itself? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Administrator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 1211 Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,052
|
Does anybody have the data on the nominal difference in height between the different posts. How much differnce does one dot make?
__________________
. . . Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 5 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 2,216
|
Ive seen Israelis numbered from 2 thru 6, this is not inclusive so there might be lower and higher numbers made.
Measuring the Izzies, aproximately .0185" difference between each number, higher number = taller sight post.
__________________
Mr pogo has left the building.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
FAL Cognoscenti
Contributor
FALaholic #: 2049 Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,769
|
A while ago,I measured a 1 and 2 dot from STG's and the difference was .020" between them.IIRC,the 1 dot was .140" tall, from the base and the 2 dot was .160" I would assume a 3 dot is .180", etc.
__________________
Nicht Amboss Sondern Hammer |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Supreme Leader
FALaholic #: 2361 Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 2,610
|
If you can't bring it up enough withthe front sight you might try an Inch rear site. I used one of the folding ones on mine to bring the POI up and still have enough front post showing to get a good sight picture.
__________________
“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add "within the limits of the law" because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” - Thomas Jefferson Salami, salami, baloney... :bow: http://www.derbyfals.com/home.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
Quote:
FWIW: the overall Inch heights are as follows- Number 4 10.17 mm Number 3 9.67 mm Number 2 9.17 mm Number 1 8.67 mm Number 0 8.17 mm Unmarked 7.67 mm Unmarked 7.17 mm Metrics: (measured from bottom of threaded post to top of pin, and top of pin to bottom of base) 2-dot Model C: 15.2 mm overall (used on G-1 and most subsequent metrics) 6.5 mm 'post height' (including base) '1' Model A: 16.6 mm overall (used on earlier high sightline metrics, such as Israeli and Argentine) 9 mm 'post height' (including base) FWIW: the FN-measured height only inlcudes the base thickness and pin height (it is the smaller of the two heights above). If you go through the mental gymnastics of the conversion to the G-1' sightplane (which is 3 mm lower than the earlier FAL-Canada versions) the Type B '1' has an equivalent post height of 6 mm. I know the Inch measurements. I had to extract the Metrics doing the math above. So, my extrapolation (read 'yank') is: Unmarked- 5.5 mm 1- 6.0 mm 2- 6.5 mm 3- 7.0 mm 4- 7.5 mm Someone pull a Type C (G-1, StG, etc) foresight pin numbered 3-dot or 4-dot and square me away.
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1594 Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baxter, TN, USA
Posts: 3,064
|
Good info, Ted - but isn't it illegal to post inch front sight measurements in millimeters?
__________________
"The way is in training." - Miyamoto Musashi |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
Quote:
Interestingly, that is how the British measured them. FWIW- this is how Blake Stevens reports them, as 'excerpted' (not transposed) from the 1954 report by 'The Inspectorate of Armaments, Woolwich Aresenal' in a report entitled "Notes on Rifle, 7,62 mm, X8E1 (known as FN Type A0 and X8E2 (known as FN Type B)for Troop Trials; Land Service 1954". The differentiation between Metric and Inch patterns is not so much the actual system of measurements, but rather in the pertinent 'owners': ABC- (Australian British Canadian, and their client states) for the L1A1 series, and the rest of the world for the so-called 'Metric' series. There never was an official 'Inch-pattern' or 'Metric-pattern' at FN. The OFFICIAL "Inch-pattern" drawings were maintained by Canada. All other Inch-pattern rifles were derivative from Canadian. FN first sold rifles to other countries using the "FAL-Canada" model! The so-called Metric did not exist until the Germans demanded concessions on the manufacturing of the G-1. The changes were so dramatic as to prompt the use of the phrase "Metric pattern". Quote:
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
Copying to FAQ
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Administrator
FALaholic #: 105 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,029
|
What difference does each sight post make in the POI at 100M or 100Y? Is there a formula for determining what sight post is needed based on how far off your POI is at a specified range and what sight post or sight height you already have?
__________________
Illigitimi non carborundum You don't know me, son. So let me explain this to you once: If I ever kill you, you'll be awake, you'll be facing me, and you'll be armed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
Well, the POI moves 1cm per click at 100m. So what. that doesn't help.
Reach for the slide rule! How many of you are old enough to remember a slide rule!? If I did the math-trig right, (22" sight radius, yadayada, voodoo incantation), then a 0.5mm change in elevation (or sight tip height) moves the pip 88.6mm at 100m ,or 8.8cm, or 3.48". So changing one 'dot' or foresight blade size moves POI about (about) 3.5 inches either way. One full rotation of the foresight pin on a Metric is 20 clicks (IIRC- don't have the system handy), that's 20cm at 100m, so that means 7.8" +/- at 100m. So, there's plenty of overlap to go from one pin height to the next.
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 4329 Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lubbock, Tx
Posts: 231
|
front sight adjustment question
How many MOA is one full revolution on the inch front sight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
1 complete revolution of the foresight blade moves MPI 8" at 100 yards. Ergo, about 7.95 MOA.
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Administrator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 1211 Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,052
|
IMBEL ( metric ) front sight math
The way I figure it, each click on the front sight is worth about one centimeter at 100 meters.
Here we go. You gotta move the sight .006" to achieve one minute-of-angle change (or one inch at 100 yards). See http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showt...threadid=21880 The metric front sight post is threaded 28 TPI See http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showt...ighlight=pitch So, for the metric you got .036" movement per revolution (6 minutes, therefore 6 inches at 100 yards.) I'm looking at an IMBEL front post. The underside has 16 ridges. So, 16 ridges per revolution means that each ridge ("click") moves the sight 0.00225" (we'll say .002 for convenience). Therefore, one click equals 1/3 minute...which means 1/3 of an inch at 100 yards. Y'all check my math now.
__________________
. . . Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Administrator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 1211 Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,052
|
Quote:
__________________
. . . Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Go Seminoles!
Contributor
FALaholic #: 38005 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,662
|
If it is possible I woulld really like to see a sticky with a table. Showing something like
Barrel Length. Point of aim at 25 meters distance for Zero @200m also 100m 16" 17" 18" 21" also include para zero'ing since the flip sight is 150 and 250 instead of 200. I am no expert at all so if there are other varitables like bullet weight or even if the barrel length comes into play at 200 meters. Seems like sighting in / zero'ing comes up a lot Last edited by preston1026; July 18, 2010 at 18:38. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|