![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
Some L1A1 questions...
Hi!
I just ordered an L1A1 and have a few questions: 1. What modifications can I do to get the maximum precision out of it? 2. I want a 9mm conversion for it, but I don't want to spend hours to change it. Is there any quick-change conversion avaliable? 3. I am using it for competition in IPSC rifle, are there any good belt mag holders avaliable? Cheers from Sweden! /Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Contributor
FALaholic #: 18603 Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 814
|
1. all you really can do is add a top cover that takes a scope. That will help you aim better but there isn't much to change a basic FAL's accuracy. You can spend a lot of money on parts and grips, stocks, and free float tubes but you may still be a 2"-4" inch per 100 meter rifle. Some individual rifles are better and some are worse but most will just be "combat" accuracte.
2. 9mm conversion? I never heard of such a beast for a FAL, would be a tight fit with the .30 cal bore. Now a .22 conversion is doable and there was a group buy in the market place awhile ago. There are also some surplus .22 trainer kits for the FAL out there. Over here the top receiver is the "firearm" and not really conducive to conversions with a larger bore. 3. I'll let someone else comment on IPSC paraphenalia. Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
Thank you for the information Steelonsteel!
Well, I guess a .22 conversion will have to do then. And perhaps I can get better accuracy by trying diffrent hand loads... The free floating handguards sounds interesting though... has anyone tried them? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Dinosaur
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 216 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down Under
Posts: 12,723
|
Depending on if you are using irons or optics but you should tighten the sight body on the base, tighten the upper to lower fit and make sure there is NO play in the flash supressor. Those were the main things we did to rifles for competition use out here.
Andy
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 51665 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 824
|
How would you recommend doing all three, assuming iron sights? I've heard of using a lock washer in the receiver hinge pin but that's about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
Thank's Andy!
Do you have any info about the performance before and after you did those things? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Curio & Relic
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 1085 Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,816
|
Take it out and shoot it and then report back with your results. You may have a real nice shooter from the start or you may need to clean your barrel, crown your barrel, replace your barrel, change ammunition or tighten something up. From an early Brit barrel with good surplus ammo I would expect anywhere from 2-6 moa 5 shot groups, late Brit barrel I expect 1.5-3 moa, Aussie 2-4 moa. I've also heard that replacing the flash suppressor with the Canadian type improves accuracy due to larger ID.
Last edited by msnyder; February 02, 2012 at 17:45. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
thanks, I'll write a range report when I get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Arrogant Bastard
Gold Contributor
FALaholic #: 96 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 15,769
|
It really is as easy as Andy described.
Squeeze the rear sight in a vise until it is a tight fit on the base but still can slide. Use a good spring for the bearing. There is a mechanism for flaring the lower receiver to make a tighter lateral fit to the upper. If there is vertical play, it is probably too much to weld up and resurface the locking lug, but you can weld or use an OS-1 or OS-2 receiver locking catch. on the flash hider, it is a careful balance. The flash hider should hand tighten to 15-30 degrees short of bottom dead center. A canadian flash hider has been overbored for "enhanced accuracy? If you crunch the flash hider on too hard you can compress the muzzle. After install, a .297 plug should pass. Ok to have some resistance at muzzle as long as plug gauge clears.
__________________
T. Mark Graham Master Gunsmith Arizona Response Systems, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Old Fart
Silver Contributor
FALaholic #: 50609 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Peoples' Republic of Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 8,842
|
The question is how accurate do you expect it to get? The FAL/L1A1 was designed as a Battle Rifle. It is not a DMR and never will be. 2-3 MOA groups are the usual, some have been able to get to 1.5 or so but I think they are the exception and somehow the stars have aligned for them.
Skennerton states in the Aussie L1A1 book that the US imported Poyer L1A1A rifles produced better accuracy results as more attention was paid to hand selecting the parts that were used in those rifles. He says these rifles were able to achieve 10 shot 1.5 inch groups at 100 yds vs 2.5 inch groups for standard production rifles. Your best bet for an accurate FAL is likely upper to lower lock up, tight sight base and the luck of the draw on the barrel. Spending money on free floating barrels and so on is likely a waste of money unless you have a bottomless pocketbook. Many people here have tried it, some have succeeded some not, others have succeeded with stock rifles which leads me to believe that the barrel is the single most important piece of the puzzle.
__________________
There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live. Public libraries cannot let the public decide what is allowed in the library, or it would be brimming with pornography and gun magazines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Curio & Relic
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 1085 Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,816
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Arrogant Bastard
Gold Contributor
FALaholic #: 96 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 15,769
|
Not convinced it makes any difference. The bullet either clears, or it doesn't. I suspect that the claim is spin. The real reason is so damage to the flash hider is less likely to cause bullet strike.
__________________
T. Mark Graham Master Gunsmith Arizona Response Systems, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Arrogant Bastard
Gold Contributor
FALaholic #: 96 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 15,769
|
Quote:
__________________
T. Mark Graham Master Gunsmith Arizona Response Systems, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 64701 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: hanna, wyoming
Posts: 84
|
I don't know the rules in your class of shooting. But if your allowed to load your own ammo, that can be the biggest improvment in accuracy. Find what the gun likes to shoot best. I'VE taken rifles from a 2 in. group to a .750 in. group@100 yds. just by loading my own ammo and finding what the liked to shoot best.
__________________
You are only old when regrets take the place of dreams. Author ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
Thank's again for the help everyone!
I have used the rifle a lot the past couple of weeks and it shoots about two MOA with german 7.62 surplus ammo / original iron sights. But probably a bit better with a scope. Here is a picture of the rifle:
__________________
Looking for a Bushmaster ACR folding stock... please point me to one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
Also, what can you guys tell me about these markings in the barrel and gas cylinder?
![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers!
__________________
Looking for a Bushmaster ACR folding stock... please point me to one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Curio & Relic
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 1085 Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 51665 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 824
|
Nice rifle!
Next question...what maker and year? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 752 Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: cc
Posts: 2,307
|
When I saw Sweden I knew it's gonna be something original, Inch or Metric, even both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
The maker is Enfield, I dont know what year. how can you tell what year its made?
__________________
Looking for a Bushmaster ACR folding stock... please point me to one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Out standing in his field
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 43401 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tx
Posts: 3,211
|
Right next to the big UE on the lower receiver, there should be a big 2 digit number....that's the year it was made.
__________________
Neo-Luddite - Traigo Mi Cuarenta y Cinco - Inch Guy I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many hours on Call of Duty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 51665 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 824
|
If it's an original-receiver rifle, the info will be on the left side of the upper receiver as well. It will read (for example) "UE 61 A12345", meaning in this case Enfield, 1961 manufacture, serial number A12345.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 63967 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 9
|
It says 60 on all reciever parts, so I guess it's from 1960
__________________
Looking for a Bushmaster ACR folding stock... please point me to one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Bronze Contributor
FALaholic #: 21731 Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Are you in a position to describe this in a little bit more detail, please? I'm the other side of the Pacific and it would be impractical to send you the rifle for the work.
__________________
Be Determined. Aim High. -- Sir Edmund Hillary 1919-2008 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|