The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapons Discussion > Ammunition > Reloading Data

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old March 15, 2011, 13:29   #1
starjammir
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 57694
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lapeer,Mi
Posts: 12
Reloading for FAL

Hey guys,
I currently reload for my Garand and M1A, and was wondering what everyones starting load would be for the FAL.
I am using 150 Gr Hornady bullets, IMR4895 powder, and 7.62 CC "mil spec" primers along with LC brass.
I currently am at 37.5 gr for my M1A with this configuration.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Bill.
starjammir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 14:02   #2
HighRatMaster
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
HighRatMaster's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 19296
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oleta CA USA
Posts: 1,186
Do you have any cycling problems at 37.5 grs? That a very conservative load, nothing wrong with that as long as it cycles normally. I normally use 42grs IMR4895 with a 147-150gr bullet and that's 2 to 5.5grs under max depending on who's source you reference. It works well and is a mild load in all my 7.62x51s, semi and bolt.
__________________
It doesn't matter what you miss them with.

Don't bother burying your guns because that's the time they need to be dug up.

"You in or out?" "I'll take his legs."
HighRatMaster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 14:20   #3
starjammir
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 57694
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lapeer,Mi
Posts: 12
Nope, no cycling issues with the M1A. I was going by the Hornady Service manual book due to shooting CMP competition shoots with the Garand and my Carbine, I thought the book would be a nice place to start for the M1A. They said I could start at 37, and I found my best groupings with 37.5, but I do plan to mess around with some 40 and some 41 gr loads.
The FAL on the other hand, I am unsure where to start for a load.
Did you have to adjust your gas system for that load vs commercial loads? I find my reloads are a bunch more tame than commercial stuff.
starjammir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 15:56   #4
AndyC
Porridge Wog
Contributor
 
AndyC's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 19755
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 11,061
Quote:
Originally posted by HighRatMaster
I normally use 42grs IMR4895 with a 147-150gr bullet
Exactly what I use, too - I've previously gone to 44gr without any issues (feels like full-power commercial loads), but have pretty much settled in on the 42gr mark.
__________________
My Iraq Pics

Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 17:30   #5
W.E.G.
Administrator
Silver Contributor
 
W.E.G.'s Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 1211
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,054
That's not just a light load.

Its a hella-light load.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg chart.jpg (84.0 KB, 186 views)
__________________
.
.
.

Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association.
W.E.G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 17:34   #6
W.E.G.
Administrator
Silver Contributor
 
W.E.G.'s Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 1211
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,054
...by contrast:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg chart2.jpg (90.1 KB, 184 views)
__________________
.
.
.

Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association.
W.E.G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 19:34   #7
Tim Dreas
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 17255
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: York,PA
Posts: 842
1981 NRA American Rifleman magazine articles says it take 42.5 grains of IMR-4895 in a military case with a 150 grain bullet to reach 2750 fps. A 1984 NRA lab test says maximum pressure is reached at around 42.0 grains of IMR-4895 in a military case with a 150 grain bullet for 2784 fps from a 24 inch test barrel. 42.0 grains with a 146 grain FMJ went 2775 fps (48,200 CUP) in the same test. Note the Hornady 150 grain FMJ is very accurate for an FMJ bullet but loading to the cannelure results in a shorter cartridge length and reduced powder capacity.

40.0gr - 2667 fps - 24" barrel - 46,800 CUP

41.0gr - 2726 fps - 24" barrel - 49,100 CUP

42.0gr - 2784 fps - 24" barrel - 51,600 CUP

Some people get away with 43.0 grains in military case without problems but usually with very little velocity gain. The Hornady bullet loaded to the cannelure will load shorter than other 150 grain bullets. The Speer and Sierra FMJ's have the cannelure a bit farther from the tip but aren't always as accurate as the Hornady FMJ bullet.

IMR powder seems to have gone downhill or changed since Hodgdon bought IMR. The last lot I got seemed a bit slower than usual.
__________________
http://www.mpri.com/
Tim Dreas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 21:59   #8
starjammir
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 57694
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lapeer,Mi
Posts: 12
That program is awesome! Where can I get a copy of that? So I take it 2200 fps is not really want I want? My fals barrel has been cut to 18",not sure that matters though.
So far this info is awesome!
starjammir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15, 2011, 23:20   #9
DYNOMIKE
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 11982
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 13,970
I shoot for 2700 w/no pressure signs..
Been able to get that with a few diff loads including IMR-4895..

Maybe a bit of useful info for you here, (I think Post #48):
http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showt...0&pagenumber=1

Check this thread as well, should keep ya busy for a couple minutes anyway..
http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showt...hreadid=287067
__________________
"If your Gonna DIE, DIE Standing UP"!!
The WOLVERINES.......
DYNOMIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 19, 2011, 09:37   #10
starjammir
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 57694
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lapeer,Mi
Posts: 12
Well I tried some of my 37.5's in the FAL, no problems, felt like a light load. I loaded up some 41's and they felt like a full on standard load. No difference in accuracy/groupings though. This was all at 100 yards, I'm sure at 200-400 there would be some though.
Thoughts?
starjammir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 19, 2011, 11:38   #11
DYNOMIKE
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 11982
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 13,970
I run my loads using IMR-4895 & a 147-150 gr pill @ 42.5 gr., this netted me 2700-2750FPS dependent on which rifle I fired it in. Accuracy was pretty darn good as was function with no changes needed to the gas setting..

While testing this powder I tried 41gr and it only gave me 2500FPS (tested on my OHLER 35P) in my STG..

Did you have to adj the gas setting for proper function with the 37.5 gr load?

I would suggest trying 42gr-42.5gr..
__________________
"If your Gonna DIE, DIE Standing UP"!!
The WOLVERINES.......
DYNOMIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 21, 2011, 07:41   #12
starjammir
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 57694
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lapeer,Mi
Posts: 12
No adjustment was needed to the gas setting, which I was surprised about. Is 42gr really going to make it that much more accurate over the 37.5 at 100 or 200 yards? If not, I'd rather save a little powder for some more ammo
starjammir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21, 2011, 13:00   #13
AndyC
Porridge Wog
Contributor
 
AndyC's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 19755
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 11,061
Won't know till you try it.

2 different but otherwise exact same style rifles might have a differerent "sweet range" within which they are at their most accurate with a given bullet - for one, the range might be quite wide ie. within a half-grain or so it'll result in the same group-size and for another it might be very narrow eg. a tenth-grain would make all the difference.

Reloading is about constant tweaking if you're wanting accuracy - there ain't many shortcuts that will avoid the need to actually go out and shoot the loads, unfortunately.
__________________
My Iraq Pics

Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 21, 2011, 13:33   #14
DYNOMIKE
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 11982
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 13,970
Quote:
Originally posted by starjammir
No adjustment was needed to the gas setting, which I was surprised about. Is 42gr really going to make it that much more accurate over the 37.5 at 100 or 200 yards? If not, I'd rather save a little powder for some more ammo
Andy is exactly right, aint no shortcuts when your trying to find a load your rifle likes.. "SOMETIMES" ya get lucky and find that load early on, sometimes ya even find a load that someone else uses that seems to work great..

"Usually" however the only way to really know is to try it and see..
As far as will it really make a diff?? YUP, 3-1/2-4.0 gr of powder might be the diff from a crap load to a great one.. Bullets make a big diff as well..

I have these PICS posted in my MUTT thread but I think it illustrates pretty well what good ammo can do for a rifle (even an FAL).. The first PIC shows a respectable (for an FAL) 20 shot group fired at 100 yds with my hand loads.. Said load was assembled with MIXED cases, no special case prep, and bulk 146gr FMJ bullets.. Again the group aint nuthin really special but it is a decent representation of what the FAL will do..


This next PIC while the same rifle was used (of course) I used once fired Matching cases that received a bit more prep in that I removed the flash hole burrs from the INSIDE the cases.. That and a much better bullet yielded this 15 shot group (w/one called flyer) two weeks later.. Now this group aint gonna win a bench gun match it's pretty damn good for a battle rifle and easily comes in at 2-MOA..


Since these are BATTLE rifles and NOT bench guns personally I prefer to evaluate accuracy with a much larger round count.. Since most guns can throw a respectable 3-5 group down range IMHO a 15-20 shot group is a more realistic measuring stick.. Using the above example the group was cut by more then half by using better ammo..
__________________
"If your Gonna DIE, DIE Standing UP"!!
The WOLVERINES.......
DYNOMIKE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 21, 2011, 14:24   #15
Tim Dreas
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 17255
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: York,PA
Posts: 842
Note that Hornady 150 grain FMJ bullets loaded to the cannelure will be shorter than cartridges loaded with other 147 - 150 FMJ bullets. This will result in less case capacity.
__________________
http://www.mpri.com/
Tim Dreas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files