The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapon Specific Forums > The FN Files

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 03, 2010, 16:28   #1
embatp
What? Me AR?
Silver Contributor
 
embatp's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 39856
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ga.
Posts: 1,919
imbel/imbel carbine....

moses/cmp build...

century/imbel "made in canada" receiver on imbel parts kit...
18 inch bipod cut barrel...
dsa rail...

us parts
piston
mag follower/floorplate
charging handle
h/t/s

gunkote black...

not sure if i like the bipod as it makes it really "nose heavy"....

embatp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 03, 2010, 16:40   #2
J. Armstrong
Minister of Amusement
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 13629
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 8,499
My personal favorite config, although I'd ditch the bipod.

One of my carbines uses a moses "Hurricane" FH, which is lighter than the combo device and an alloy lower. Really ices the cake of the already nice handling of those acrbines !

I have an L1A1 folding cocking handle on it and that's the part I'm still not sure I like ---- it's always something !!!

Nice rifle
__________________
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools" Herbert Spenser

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
J. Armstrong is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 03, 2010, 16:46   #3
embatp
What? Me AR?
Silver Contributor
 
embatp's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 39856
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ga.
Posts: 1,919
yeah...i have been thinking about a hurricane fh....this actually came off an inch kit so i could go back with the folding ch but i like the knob type better....thinking about putting a para type rear sight on it as well....also may get rid of the rail for matches....should lighten up pretty good....
embatp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 03, 2010, 21:39   #4
emcroy
Registered
Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 33420
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,007
Both rifles look great. Just curious, but why the folder on the full length upper and the para upper on the full stock lower ?
emcroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 03, 2010, 22:06   #5
embatp
What? Me AR?
Silver Contributor
 
embatp's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 39856
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ga.
Posts: 1,919
just wanted it that way....the original 50.61 was 21 inch i believe...18 inch para's came later....
embatp is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 04, 2010, 16:24   #6
embatp
What? Me AR?
Silver Contributor
 
embatp's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 39856
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: ga.
Posts: 1,919
ok...how about this?
imbel carbine receiver and front end...para lower..falcon no nose para dustcover...18 inch PARA...sucky pic....

embatp is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files