The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapon Specific Forums > The FN Files

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 06, 2008, 12:56   #1
HKocher
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1032
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 5
Springfield SAR48?

I'm looking to buy a Para FAL, and was considering a DSA SA58 or STG58. Came across a Springfield Arms Para SAR48, but I don't know much about the Springfield guns.

These are all pre-89 guns, right? Are they priced similar to DSAs or are the more/less expensive?

How does the quality compare to the DSA guns? Any other issues I should be aware of?

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by HKocher; April 06, 2008 at 14:49.
HKocher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 06, 2008, 16:51   #2
Brad
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 58
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 157
A SAR 48 PARA it is factory made FAL from a real FN licensed manufacturer and outstanding quality. It is one of the best all around FALs ever made, and that includes the Belgium's... IMHO they are better quality than DSA...

YMMV

Brad
__________________
KMA 367
Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 06, 2008, 17:24   #3
ftierson
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 13827
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 11,047
Quote:
Originally posted by Brad
A SAR 48 PARA it is factory made FAL from a real FN licensed manufacturer and outstanding quality. It is one of the best all around FALs ever made, and that includes the Belgium's... IMHO they are better quality than DSA...
I'm not sure that I would go quite this far...

I have a SA SAR-48 rifle and, while it's a very nice gun, I don't think that it's quite as nice as the DSA guns...

The SAR-48 rifles were made by Imbel in Brazil (which is a licensed FAL manufacturer) for Springfield Armory. They have chrome lined barrels and were painted over parkerizing...

They are nice guns, but, cosmetically, I don't think that they're quite as pretty as some of the DSA rifles (for example, on the SAR-48 that I have, the outside surfaces of the magwell are somewhat uneven under the paint. The DSA receivers are nicer).

Having said all this, I do think that the SAR-48 rifles are certainly worth picking up for the right price. And, strength-wise, they probably are the strongest FALs ever produced...

For what it's all worth...

Forrest
ftierson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 06, 2008, 17:53   #4
toysntoys
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 35018
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posts: 2
WTK- SPRINGFILD SAR 48 PARA

HI

Any know the going price for a Springfield SAR 48 PARA? I interested in find one but, not sure of the current selling price.


Thanks.........MARK
toysntoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 06, 2008, 18:08   #5
HKocher
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1032
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 5
There was one selling for $1400 on another board. It went pretty quick, so I figured it was a good price. That's what prompted me to post this thread.
HKocher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 07, 2008, 23:52   #6
Brad
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 58
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bear Flag Republic
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally posted by ftierson


I'm not sure that I would go quite this far...

I have a SA SAR-48 rifle and, while it's a very nice gun, I don't think that it's quite as nice as the DSA guns...

The SAR-48 rifles were made by Imbel in Brazil (which is a licensed FAL manufacturer) for Springfield Armory. They have chrome lined barrels and were painted over parkerizing...

They are nice guns, but, cosmetically, I don't think that they're quite as pretty as some of the DSA rifles (for example, on the SAR-48 that I have, the outside surfaces of the magwell are somewhat uneven under the paint. The DSA receivers are nicer).

Having said all this, I do think that the SAR-48 rifles are certainly worth picking up for the right price. And, strength-wise, they probably are the strongest FALs ever produced...

For what it's all worth...

Forrest
FAL's are battle rifles, not race cars... The SAR 48s (4800s) are classic battles rifles in the truest sense of the word... The SAR 48s were all built on a FN licensed military production line and given a military finish... The DSA's are built on a civilian production and given a civilian finish...

Much like Colt Law Enforcement Carbines, LE 6920's, are built by Colt Defense using the M4A1 TDP and Bushmasters are built on a civilian production line with reverse engineering... They both have their place in the world, but if you are betting your life on your rifle, which one would you choose???

Just my .02

Brad
__________________
KMA 367
Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 08, 2008, 18:09   #7
Rifle_Guy
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2295
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 498
"if you are betting your life on your rifle, which one would you choose???"

The one I built myself.
__________________
http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/g...member1102.png

http://militarysignatures.com/signatures/member1102.png

If arms are instruments of power then, in a republic, do they not, rightly, belong in the hands of the people?
Rifle_Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 10, 2008, 20:06   #8
ketum3
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 8345
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 173
There was a factory Para here for sale a month or so ago that sold for asking price $ 1,800. It was advertised as 98%. Sold within a couple of days.
ketum3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files