The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapons Discussion > Ammunition

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 28, 2001, 10:07   #1
Wadman
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1095
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: North East Illinois
Posts: 2,820
Muzzle Energy Formula

Anyone know what it is? Also, what's the formula for computing sectional density?

Buff, thanks. Writing it down this time so I don't lose it.

[ June 28, 2001: Message edited by: Wadman ]
__________________
The low road is frequently a four lane highway with no speed limit.


Help Save the Kitties
Wadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 10:29   #2
BUFF
Old Fart
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 789
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 7,133
Muzzle energy is obtained by multiplying the square of the velocity (in feet per seconds) by the weight of the bullet in grains and dividing by 450,000.

Sectional density is obtained by dividing the bullet's weight in pounds (7,000 grains in a pound, so a 147 grain bullet weighs 0.021 pounds) by the square of it's diameter in inches.

[ June 28, 2001: Message edited by: BUFF ]
__________________
BUFF
BUFF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 11:09   #3
EMDII
Evil Moderator

Silver Contributor
 
EMDII's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 6
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
KE = [M(V-squared)]/2 (thanks!)

- Typical BC for .30 MilSpec is around 0.387
- SD is related to exterior and terminal ballistics. You want a high SD for in-flight (exterior) ballistics. The depleted uranium long-rod penetrator (LRP) of the M1 tank 120mm gun has a VERY high SD on the order of 3. The SD of a typical .308 is 0.221.

Low SD is preferable inside the barrel (interior ballistics). This has the result of presenting a large piston to the expanding gas, accelerating the projectile quickly. Once you are exterior, high SD minimizes drag. In the case of the SABOT round, it also maximizes forces present as the round attempts (usually successfully and terminally) to penetrate the target.

[ June 28, 2001: Message edited by: EMDII ]
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are."

E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II
1*
EMDII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 11:44   #4
Southern Raider
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2045
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 166
Slight correction:

Kinetic Energy = 0.5 * mass * velocity^2

In English units, mass is in slugs and I cannot confirm how many grains are in a slug.
Southern Raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 13:29   #5
DanB35
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 3490
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by Southern Raider:
In English units, mass is in slugs and I cannot confirm how many grains are in a slug.
It's 7000 grains to the pound, and ~32.16 pounds to the slug, so ~225120 grains/slug.
DanB35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 20:30   #6
doubletap
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1426
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Northern Taiga-land
Posts: 828
For determining muzzle energy why not use the old Dean Grennel formula, it is quick, easy to remember, and typically accurate to a couple of foot pounds.

bullet weigth(in grains) divided by the constant 225218, times muzzle velocity, times muzzle velocity, divided by 2. works every time.

Doubletap
doubletap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 20:40   #7
K. Funk
Real Life Metallurgist
Gold Contributor
 
K. Funk's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 38
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Myerstown, PA
Posts: 3,938
I haven't heard the term "slug" as applies to physics for years. Hats off to you mad ballistic physicists.

krf
__________________
The Mason-Dixon FAL Association wants YOU!! Ask me for details.

You never know what's going on inside the mind of a crazy man!!

Check out username kandainv on Gunbroker; always some neat stuff!!
FYB!!!!
K. Funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28, 2001, 23:59   #8
BUFF
Old Fart
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 789
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 7,133
Does anyone use the quantity of "mole" anymore?

Man, I am getting old!
__________________
BUFF
BUFF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 29, 2001, 05:17   #9
Southern Raider
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2045
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally posted by BUFF:
Does anyone use the quantity of "mole" anymore?
Yes, but this is more for chemistry. 6.023E23(?) molecules.
Southern Raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29, 2001, 06:07   #10
EMDII
Evil Moderator

Silver Contributor
 
EMDII's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 6
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
Quote:
Originally posted by Southern Raider:
Yes, but this is more for chemistry. 6.023E23(?) molecules.
Or would that be Avogadro's Number!

Man this is too fun!
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are."

E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II
1*
EMDII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29, 2001, 07:33   #11
Wadman
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1095
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: North East Illinois
Posts: 2,820
You guys are killing me.
__________________
The low road is frequently a four lane highway with no speed limit.


Help Save the Kitties
Wadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files