The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapons Discussion > Ammunition

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 12, 2001, 14:40   #1
JoeG
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 326
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: US
Posts: 17
What powders work for you?

Just wondering what powders have worked well in 308 for the FAL. I have had great success with WW 748. I'm thinking about trying some IMR powders. What different powders have worked well for you?

[ May 12, 2001: Message edited by: JoeG ]
JoeG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2001, 15:41   #2
Upside Down @ 100 MPH
Unregistered
 
FALaholic #: 2405
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 659
The only IMR powder I've tried is 4064 and it does well for me with 168 grain Hornady match bullets.

Two other powders that are equally as good with this bullet in my gun are N140 and Hodgon Varget, but I ain't through testing yet.
__________________
"It is not the facts that guide many through life but their beliefs about what the facts are that guide them. "
-DABTL-
Upside Down @ 100 MPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2001, 17:02   #3
BUFF
Old Fart
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 789
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 7,139
IMR-4895, either new or surplus (NOT H-4895, it's another powder altogether!) and W-748 with 147-150 grain bullets. IMR-4895 with 168 grain bullets. Next to try is N-140 with 168 grain bullets, it is supposed to burn cleaner, no big deal with an FAL but good for a glass-bedded M-1A. I am happy with the two powders I have tried so far.

My standard "blasting" 7.62 load for less-than-match rifles is Federal, W-W military or Lake City military brass, CCI thick-cup primer (No. 34), FN or Hornaday 147 grain FMJ bullet, and IMR-4895 to try to duplicate ball ammo.

I haven't loaded a lot of ball equivalent since I started buying milsurp, though. With Radway Green, DAG and Hirtenberger delivered for $125-$180/1,000, it makes handloading seem an expensive luxury. I do save my Hirty empties, though, because I know the milsurp .308/7.62 will dry up sooner or later.
__________________
BUFF
BUFF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2001, 10:24   #4
sixplusone
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2667
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NE Oregon
Posts: 489


[ September 04, 2001: Message edited by: sixplusone ]
sixplusone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2001, 10:25   #5
sixplusone
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2667
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NE Oregon
Posts: 489
Forgot; Benchmark looks good for the lighter bullets.
sixplusone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2001, 19:17   #6
K. Funk
Real Life Metallurgist
Gold Contributor
 
K. Funk's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 38
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Myerstown, PA
Posts: 3,939
I use IMR 4895 exclusively for use in all my .308 (and '06, 8mm, 7.5, 6.5) rifles, with the exception of my hunting load for my Model 7, where I use 4064. I have no preferrence over mil vs. comm brass, but I do try to keep them seperate. I agree with Buff that loading .308 is a money losing proposotion when compared to going surplus prices. I am sitting on a pile of .308 brass right now and I am seriously considering priming only for future use. I cannot see dumping pounds of powder into these when surplus is so much cheaper.

My .02

krf
__________________
The Mason-Dixon FAL Association wants YOU!! Ask me for details.

You never know what's going on inside the mind of a crazy man!!

Check out username kandainv on Gunbroker; always some neat stuff!!
FYB!!!!
K. Funk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2001, 21:49   #7
W.E.G.
Administrator
Silver Contributor
 
W.E.G.'s Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 1211
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,052
The .308 is tolerant of virtually any rifle powder. I've tried various IMR and Accurate Arms powders. They all work. Milsurp powders are a good choice to save $$$.

However, a big problem with reloading for FAL's is that most chambers are very generous, and extraction/ejection does great violence to the brass. You won't get many reloadings from a batch of brass before you start seeing an unacceptable number of head separations.
__________________
.
.
.

Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association.
W.E.G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2001, 03:52   #8
Ratlord
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 1418
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 458
I really like WInchester 760. I like the fact that it's a ball powder which makes it really easy to measure out. On the down side it really stinks when fired...
__________________
"Literalism must be avoided because there is no surer way to misread any document than to read it literally." -New Jersey Supreme Court

Mark

San Diego
mark@markstoddard.com
Ratlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2001, 09:04   #9
sixplusone
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 2667
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NE Oregon
Posts: 489
Mr. Jeter is that generous chamber responsible for the swell of .006 thou. just in front of the web?

I think I might have to look into the bulk ammo and just pay the darn shipping costs to W.Coast. Rather than working the brass.

AnotherQ; are pointed FMJ the standard with regards to reliable mag feeding?
sixplusone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2001, 14:58   #10
BUFF
Old Fart
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 789
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 7,139
Sixplusone:

I'll answer for Gary, if he doesn't mind.

Yes, the chamber's dimensions are responsible for the swelling of the fired casing above the cartridge's web or head. The side wall of the cartridge case is much thicker at the bottom end (web or head), and it doesn't expand like the thinner wall above it. The swelling is not limited to FALs or military rifles. I have a Ruger M-77 in 7x57 Mauser that expands there worse than any U.S. or European military rifle I have ever seen, and a hunting buddy's M-77
in .30-06 is so over-size we had to send a sizing die and some fired cases to RCBS to have them bevel the bottom (entry) of the sizing die more to get the case reduced instead of the case just smashing and crumpling above the head or web. (Ruger said the chamber was within their manufacturer's specifications and recommend no handloads be used in their guns.)

Yes, pointed FMJ is the standard in the FAL, and most all other battle rifles, especially semiauto and auto, for reliablility. That is what they are designed for.

I have not shot any, but read nothing but good reports on the Singapore milsurp, and Dan's sells it at a very attractive price, with minimal additional shipping cost to the west. Century also includes shipping in the cost of their ammo to anywhere in the continental U.S.

[ May 14, 2001: Message edited by: BUFF ]
__________________
BUFF
BUFF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2001, 17:24   #11
50 cal
Registered
 
50 cal's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 135
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 515
I use the surplus WC846 I get from www.gibrass.com It is the equivilent of BL(C)2. Works great in any gas operated gun. Works wonders out of both of my M1A's.

Using 43.6g of the WC846 and pulled 150g FN bullets, both my FAL's use a gas setting of 5.
__________________
50 BMG, when it absolutely, positively has to be destroyed right now!
50 cal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files