![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1442 Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,581
|
bolt/bolt carrier interchange headspace question
I checked through the archives and I can't seem to find anything that answers my question.
I just bought a new DSA SA58. Say I wanted to swap the bolt and bolt carrier out for a different one, which is also new. Would the rifle have to be re-headspaced? Can you interchange the bolts and bolt carriers between rifles considering the fact that they are all new? How about switching used components? I want to have some bolt and carrier combos as spares, so can I just replace them whenever I wish, or does that constitute having the rifle re-headspaced again too? ![]() [ August 25, 2001: Message edited by: gary.jeter ] |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1751 Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: phx
Posts: 1,442
|
in a related vein, can you use a sandcut carrier with your originial bolt and if you do do you need to re headspace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 1211 Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 31,056
|
There is some previous testing in this regard.
See: http://www.l1a1.com/cgi-bin/forums/u...&f=10&t=000162
__________________
. . . Ask me about the Mason-Dixon FAL Collectors Association. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1442 Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,581
|
Thanks Gary. That's the post I was looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 1684 Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: next door to my neighbors, in Texas of the the USA
Posts: 1,426
|
There was really good info in that post. I just pulled out several bolts, inch and metric, and I got a total of .003", which would still be considered safe if you headspace tight when building.
Either way, I will always recheck headspace if I change the bolt. I have read where some WECSOG and wanna be armourers filed on the bolt for headspacing. As we say at work, it is better to err on the side of safety. I don't want to eat a bolt. With 50,000+ psi that close to my face, I want to check it. ![]() Rechecked after reading Ted's post, and I still had .003" difference from my tightest to loosest bolt (out of 14 checked). Maybe a fluke, but a fluke is sometimes normal in surplus stuff. ![]() [ August 26, 2001: Message edited by: ricochet ]
__________________
It is what it is... ... NRA Endowment Lifetime Member- |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Evil Moderator
Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 6 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 13,971
|
Australian 6202075
8.580 cm RA (South African) 0649/17335 8.580 cm Enfield 58 A135648 8.581 cm Enfield 58 A9219 8.580 cm StG (FN-built) 3931 8.581 cm Measured from angle of locking lug to face of breech block. 0.001cm as I can best determine using digital micrometer. So, the variable seems to be broaching the LC location in the receiver, and receiver/barrel interface dimensions. Coupled w/ minor variations in chamber reaming, this may be why we can interchange bolts relatively easily in a rifle whose 'total' headspace (LS face to .400" dimension on chamber shoulder) is properly set. You can bet that bolts did not vary by more than a thousandth or two.
__________________
"The Spartans do not enquire how many enemy there are. The SPartans merely enquire WHERE they are." E.M. (Ted) Dannemiller II 1* |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|