![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 4319 Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,142
|
Anti-sieze or thread lock??
I've seen several guys touting the use of anti sieze compound on the barrel when installing. Others reccomend loc-tite.
If a barrel times at 10:30 to 11:00 which is it? Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 3402 Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SC, US
Posts: 177
|
I used both (bear with me). I used anti-seize on about the inside 3/4 of the threads. On the outside 1/4, I used a good helping of loc-tite. I didn't want to leave any part of the threads bare, after a bad experience trying to loosen a barrel that I hand-tightened without either anti-seize or loc-tite. I didn't trust anti-seize to hold everything together even with my ~200ft/#'s of torque. So, I compromised. I figured that at worst case, I could take a torch to the outside of the barrel to heat it up to break the loc-tite. Was that a weird plan? I thought it made sense.z
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 4319 Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 2,142
|
btt
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Polak 210
Contributor
FALaholic #: 137 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 3,874
|
There is no reason to use thread lockers on the barrel. Now if you will have to rebarrel in the future you will thanx yourself for using antisieze...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered
FALaholic #: 18 Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: PRM
Posts: 79
|
I've never used either on any of my builds or rebuilds, just a light coating of oil. Just make sure the barrel timing is correct and no chemical help is needed. The only reason I could see for using loctite is if the barrel timing is loose, or anti-seize if it is too tight. In either case I would rather correct the mechanical problem than rely on chemical crutches. Just my opinion, ....
![]() [ October 19, 2001: Message edited by: Naz ]
__________________
"Immaginarsi Nessun Liberali" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|