The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapon Specific Forums > The FN Files

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 26, 2017, 16:47   #1
greggv
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 51232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario, Ca
Posts: 25
Angry Cal legal? What's it take??

What's it take to make our FAL's Cal legal? I know there's all kinds of stuff for AR's but I haven't seen much for FAL's. Anyone help?
greggv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 26, 2017, 17:30   #2
SAFN49
None
Platinum Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 73015
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: No Where
Posts: 8,811
Fin on the grip, no muzzle device, 10 round mag permanently fixed with a stripper clip top cover Someone willing to ship the rifle to CA and go through their out of state dealer registration so an out of state dealer can ship to a dealer in CA.
SAFN49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 26, 2017, 18:35   #3
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
The two options are "featureless" or fixed-mag.

Featureless requires removing all features prohibited to semi-auto centrefire rifles with detachable magazines (now including magazines that require a tool for removal and not just pushing a lever or button). No pistol grip, no flash suppressor (and the definition of such makes many muzzle brakes and compensators run afoul of the law or at least be questionable), no thumbhole stock, no grenade or flare launcher, no forward pistol grip (I think the angled foregrip might be an issue as well for those who like those), and no folding/collapsible stock.

To be compliant is to basically used a fixed stock, or used a folding stock that has been modified to keep it from folding; use a grip with a built-in fin or a grip wrap with a fin that keeps your thumb from wrapping around the back of the grip; and either using no muzzle device or using a muzzle device that does not reduce flash or direct flash away from the shooter's field of view, or is advertised or designed/intended to do the same.

The upsides are that with this configuration you can use the standard magazine release and hi-cap mags. It's also something that can readily be accomplished. The downside is that the grip fins kill ergonomics and if you actually want to use the FAL for social use the flash in low-light conditions can be an issue, such as by affecting your night vision. Also looks terrible, aesthetically, but this is at best a secondary consideration for most.

The other option is fixed-magazine. The definition has been changed such that the magazine has to be fixed in a manner that makes it impossible to remove without disassembling the action. This can include opening up two-piece actions like what is found on the FAL, removal of the bolt group, separation of action halves, or other disassembly that basically renders the rifle inoperable while it is in that condition. In this configuration you can keep all features, but you cannot use a magazine with a capacity larger than ten rounds, as it would then become an assault weapon by default. For ease of reloading, a charger guide top cover is strongly recommended, but has no bearing on legalities. On paras, this can only be done by using the DSA or Tapco scope mount that is short and has the charger-guide built in (I'm not sure if any other para-compatible charger-guide scope mount has ever been made by anyone else).

Currently, this sort of thing can only be done using epoxies, pins, rivets, or welds to basically prevent the mag catch from being able to move or be removed without opening the action, or to directly attach the magazine to the receiver. Such methods are generally undesirable. Some methods recommended still by some, such as the set screw method with the magazine catch, don't meet the legal standard. There is work currently being done on a possible compliance solution that is more palatable and some proof-of-concept work has been successfully accomplished. I can't say much more than that right now, but if we can find a way to ensure that it can't be defeated without opening the action, then it will be the best way to fix the magazine in place as it would not permanently affect any major parts and could be restored to a standard configuration within minutes. Another idea someone else had which is different was to drill a hole in the magazine body and use a bent cotter pin to attach the magazine, using the hole, to the upper by wrapping the ends around the ejector. If it could stand up to an effort to remove the magazine and could actually stand up to actual shooting of the rifle, that could work well, potentially, and it would require removal of the bolt group and top cover in order to undo and/or release the magazine. Right now there is no production compliance item to fix the magazine.

The upside to the fixed magazine is that it preserves good ergonomics, preserves the ability to use flash suppression, and preserves other features that someone may find fun (like being able to launch inert grenades) or desirable. It also results in better aesthetics. With a charger-guide, loading may not be quite as easy as changing the magazine, or even as easy as charger-loading most other rifles with this feature, but is still able to be done relatively quickly and easily using NATO 7.62mm chargers. Downside is that you are limited to ten rounds and reloading, again, can't be accomplished without changing the magazine. In many cases, there may also be a need to engage in undesirable modifications to major or expensive parts, although there may be solutions to this problem in the near future.

The other thing to be aware of is overall length. Any semi-auto rifle has to be at least 30 inches long with the stock folded, fully collapsed, etc. (if applicable).; basically, 30 inches or longer in its shortest configuration as configured, or it is an assault weapon regardless of whether or not the magazine is detachable and what features it may have. A FAL para with combo device and 18" barrel just meets this standard. One with a 17.2" barrel (and certainly any shorter types available) fall short. In this case, even with a fixed magazine, you'd have to modify the stock to keep it from folding. The CA DOJ has also illegally altered the OAL requirement so that it does not include any removable muzzle device, which makes even the 18" para an issue. I believe this action is being challenged in court, or soon will be, as they made the change in the wake of the laws passed recently, and those laws made no changes to the legal definitions for OAL. This was completely a DOJ initiative. Under this standard, the muzzle device would need to be integral or permanently attached using similar standards for keeping a weapon from being treated like an SBR.

Also, FALs cannot be on the Roberti-Roos list. If it is listed by both make and model, then it is an assault weapon by name and no changes to the configuration can change its status; even the stripped receiver is an AW. All FNs except for those with the model name "FN .308" are on the list, to the best of my knowledge. I can't remember if the SAR-48 is on the list or not. I don't believe any other FAL is on there by both make and model, but it is best to check and be sure.

Any FAL registered as an AW, regardless of what category or whether or not it actually meets the definition, cannot be transferred.

If you own a FAL that meets the pre-2017 definition of fixed magazine, which you acquired or configured that way before 2017, using a bullet button or similar device, or any other method that can be undone without disassembling the action, then you can keep it without issue until July 2018. You have until then to either sell it to someone with an assault weapon permit (it may have to be an FFL with such a permit, I can't recall for sure), destroy/deactivate it, turn it in, remove it from the State, modify it so that it is in a legal configuration under either the featureless or new fixed mag standard, or register it as an assault weapon. DOJ has made the process more onerous and for anyone technologically challenged, potentially infeasible. They have also stated that you must keep the bullet button or whatnot in place after registration, but this has no basis in the law and is being challenged in court, but it is what is currently being enforced.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 26, 2017, 19:45   #4
lew
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
lew's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 16727
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,717
Seems like the expense sunk into insuring that a rifle meets compliance regulations would be better off put into procuring a moving truck.
__________________
Statism: Ideas so great, they're mandatory.

There is not a problem that government cannot make worse.
lew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 26, 2017, 23:51   #5
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
Not really. Some of us aren't in a position to leave, anyways.

Also. I forgot to mention that if parts are removed to prevent it from functioning as a semi-auto or functioning at all, DOJ is considering it no longer a semi-auto and thus not an AW. Removing the gas piston is an expedient way to go about that and costs nothing if keeping it rather than shooting it as a semi-auto is the main concern.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 27, 2017, 00:14   #6
SAFN49
None
Platinum Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 73015
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: No Where
Posts: 8,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick61 View Post

Also, FALs cannot be on the Roberti-Roos list. If it is listed by both make and model, then it is an assault weapon by name and no changes to the configuration can change its status; even the stripped receiver is an AW. All FNs except for those with the model name "FN .308" are on the list, to the best of my knowledge. I can't remember if the SAR-48 is on the list or not. I don't believe any other FAL is on there by both make and model, but it is best to check and be sure.
Are featureless Indian 1A1's with a 10 round detachable mag listed on Roberti-Roos?

SAFN49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 27, 2017, 00:37   #7
EinheitElf
Registered
 
EinheitElf's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 21533
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 3,409
SSSSLLLLLIIICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!! ^^^^
EinheitElf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 27, 2017, 01:56   #8
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
Should be GTG. The only FALs banned by name are the FN .308 Match, FAL, and LAR, as well as the Springfield Armory, Inc. SAR-48.

The clear grip wrap is a great idea from an aesthetic perspective for those going that route.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 27, 2017, 03:00   #9
Parga
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 70964
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Marina/USA
Posts: 213
Hopefully in the next week or so I'll be making a few mag catch inserts that will hold the mag but will be flush with the receiver and immobile. I while back I experimented with some mag catches by silver soldering a block to the back portion then fitting to the receiver. Mag is locked and can only be removed by removing the BHO/mag catch screw. Loading is facilitated by either stripper clip top cover or by breaking action open and removing top cover and bolt group
Parga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 01, 2017, 15:30   #10
falbuild
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 78671
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Little Rock Arkansas
Posts: 39
easy solution

Just remove the grip & flash hider & 10rd mag. That's all you need to ship a FAL to a CA FFL. But check with the FFL first.
falbuild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 06:11   #11
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by falbuild View Post
Just remove the grip & flash hider & 10rd mag. That's all you need to ship a FAL to a CA FFL. But check with the FFL first.
Or just ship the barreled upper assembly to the FFL and the rest to the buyer.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 08:41   #12
Impala_Guy
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 55819
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gamecock Country
Posts: 2,716
__________________
Don't spread our wealth around, spread our work ethic.........
Impala_Guy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 11:20   #13
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parga View Post
Hopefully in the next week or so I'll be making a few mag catch inserts that will hold the mag but will be flush with the receiver and immobile. I while back I experimented with some mag catches by silver soldering a block to the back portion then fitting to the receiver. Mag is locked and can only be removed by removing the BHO/mag catch screw. Loading is facilitated by either stripper clip top cover or by breaking action open and removing top cover and bolt group

Really excited to see what you are working on Parga - we need a compliance device here behind the iron kurtain in a big way!

Based on your above description and my understanding of the new AW definition, one issue I see is that if the mag catch/BHO screw can be removed with the action closed (thus allowing the modified magazine catch to release the magazine with the action closed) then it will still be an Assault Weapon in the eyes of the DOJ. In a nutshell you are using a tool (to remove parts) to remove the magazine with the action closed = not really all that different than the current FAL 'bullet buttons' we have to use. Perhaps I am misunderstanding your description?

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...1&d=1508545164
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 11:47   #14
lew
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
lew's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 16727
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impala_Guy View Post
No kidding. Liberty (or at least a considerable increase thereof) is only a state away to the east or northeast (OR's a bit precarious). Some will make excuses, though.
__________________
Statism: Ideas so great, they're mandatory.

There is not a problem that government cannot make worse.
lew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 13:56   #15
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew View Post
No kidding. Liberty (or at least a considerable increase thereof) is only a state away to the east or northeast (OR's a bit precarious). Some will make excuses, though.
Easier said than done, but this crap is all some people seem to have the ability to "contribute". The only way I can move out of State is if I want to live as a homeless person. I couldn't even afford to rent the moving truck. I'm also not going to stop taking care of my grandfather and avoid spending time with him in his final years over gun laws. But again, talk about "moving" is easier for some on the outside than saying anything useful.

One day I'll make a permament move (most likely to AZ), but it can't be right now. In the meantime, there is a need to be compliant in public.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 02, 2017, 16:51   #16
alfa1
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 89
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: No Longer Trapped In Occupied Territory
Posts: 105
While most of those on this board do not live in Kali or have to prostrate themselves to its overreaching gun laws, you might find some useful information on this site:
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/i...id=6&styleid=6
There are still some resilient individuals in that state that have developed solutions for dilemma’s similar to yours. Read and ask questions.

It seems to me at least, a solution for you would be to find a good used Ruger Mini 14 ranch rifle and some 10 round mags....I can’t say positively if this is a good to go fix, but nothing on that rifle ‘screams Assault Weapon’. So, myself and my contraband having escaped the Golden State of Confusion this past January. The air is a little easier to breath and things are much cheaper too !

If your intent is to pursue the having of a FAL type rifle in that state..Good Luck!
alfa1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 04, 2017, 03:31   #17
Parga
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 70964
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Marina/USA
Posts: 213
Actually the magazine would stay in place and load from the top with either a stripper clip top cover or simply removing the dust cover. Essentially ala SKS.
I'm going to a CA DOJ class next month so I'm going to ask about it then for clarification. Stay tuned

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho Hambre View Post
Really excited to see what you are working on Parga - we need a compliance device here behind the iron kurtain in a big way!

Based on your above description and my understanding of the new AW definition, one issue I see is that if the mag catch/BHO screw can be removed with the action closed (thus allowing the modified magazine catch to release the magazine with the action closed) then it will still be an Assault Weapon in the eyes of the DOJ. In a nutshell you are using a tool (to remove parts) to remove the magazine with the action closed = not really all that different than the current FAL 'bullet buttons' we have to use. Perhaps I am misunderstanding your description?

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...1&d=1508545164
Parga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 26, 2017, 15:58   #18
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
Calling Parga - Any Intel to Share?

Parga - I am really curious and would love to hear what you learned at the CA DOJ class you attended in regards to compliance devices/modifications. Specifically if they touched on what the minimum standard of permanence that a compliance part/modification/device must achieve in order to comply with the pending AW law...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Parga View Post
Actually the magazine would stay in place and load from the top with either a stripper clip top cover or simply removing the dust cover. Essentially ala SKS.
I'm going to a CA DOJ class next month so I'm going to ask about it then for clarification. Stay tuned
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 26, 2017, 17:55   #19
Parga
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 70964
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Marina/USA
Posts: 213
Sorry for the delay, it's been busy to say the least.
Talked to the Special Agent Supervisor at the class on 12/7 and I explained to him what I had come up with and he was interested in seeing it. I'm taking photos and sending them to him on thursday. I'll let you know what he has to say. He said a level of permanence would include epoxying the magazine to the receiver...Go figure
Parga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 26, 2017, 19:04   #20
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
If his take that epoxy achieves permanence is in fact the DOJs opinion, then that is certainly encouraging news...
PM sent
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 27, 2017, 00:34   #21
adbm3
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 61973
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Danville, California
Posts: 282
Yeah, really not helpful there. When all y'all battle it out on the front lines then I'll have a bit more respect. you might also want to consider moving into california because loss of votes here to protect your own rear ends somewhere else only contributes to stupid out of stater comments about how crazy it is here when you really don't know and only are characterizing a very concentrated portion of the state. Just be prepared for when they start coming for you. Yep, Lisa Murkowski is real peach too.

Peoples republic legal for an FAL as far as I can surmise is to place a fin on the grip and either remove the flash hider, or better, use a muzzle brake. Also, importantly, take off the bullet button if you do the foregoing. Leaving it on or gluing your mag or pinning your mag and using a stripper cover or whatever other dumb thing you want to do to the mag now classifies the rifle as an assault weapon. It is conceivable that a mag can be locked in place and only removable if the take down lever is used to "Break" the action apart for the purpose of removing the magazine. This is one of the options all the AR guys are taking.
adbm3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27, 2017, 07:25   #22
raubvogel
Registered
Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 64403
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,505
Your argument is very interesting: your state is becoming too gun hating? Move to the next one. Guess what? What is stopping the gun hating crowd from moving to the same state you moved to? They might make the move for the other reasons you would, like economy going down the tubes for the decisions the politicians they voted in did, but they will not make the correlation because they are always right.

I cannot find it right now but there is a scene in the original War of the Worlds movie in which they explain the invaders's movements: they attack an area, consolidate their control, and then move to the next. This is what the other side is doing. The end game is still the same: control everything. You can keep on moving but one day you will have nowhere else to move.
__________________
All I'm really asking for here is a knife that will not jam and a unicorn that doesn't need sharpening. Will_Power
It's been my experience that all you really need to harvest a deer is a car. They come right through the windshield just fine. 357ross
That poop is priceless. MFC
raubvogel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27, 2017, 13:20   #23
rick1881
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 21167
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 8
When I bought my CA legal SA 58 10-12 years ago the mag was a fixed 10 rounder w/ stripper clip dust cover and I remember what I had to do to just to take it apart to see how the mag was secured, had to separate the upper from the lower just to get at the parts. If you can't remove the mag with the upper and lower assembled??? what am I missing about a fixed mag.

If I was to go featureless who has the parts other than DSA for the muzzle brake and stock mag release?
Thanks
Rick
__________________
"I'm gonna need a hacksaw." Jack Bauer
rick1881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 27, 2017, 22:30   #24
Slaughter
Veteran Member
Silver Contributor
 
Slaughter's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 73180
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 1,328
I wrote to Bulletbutton.com to ask about CA-legality and got their reply: (note, I already use their bullet buttons on my ARs and FALs but with mid-year law changes, need to have mag drop after opening action.

Quote:
Will you have new device for .CA compliance for our FALs?

I have your bullet button but obviously mid year I will no longer be in compliance.

Help?!

Steve Slaughter
Quote:
Fear not Old Buell Racer!

WE will have you covered before the deadline.

Darin
Slaughter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 28, 2017, 12:03   #25
rick1881
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 21167
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 8
Thank's I'll keep my eyes open.
__________________
"I'm gonna need a hacksaw." Jack Bauer
rick1881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 05, 2018, 10:10   #26
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
Whatever the solution, I don’t think it should involve any modifications to the receiver - ideally just simple drop in replacement part(s).
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 05, 2018, 15:37   #27
bigstick61
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 45299
Join Date: May 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,486
One of the members here is working on just such a thing. There may end up being a couple of options, at least.

ETA: I forgot you go by Macho Hambre here, LOL.

Last edited by bigstick61; January 05, 2018 at 19:10.
bigstick61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 05, 2018, 16:26   #28
sgr
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 78104
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 133
Nice

Thanks for the update!
sgr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 05, 2018, 20:31   #29
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
...I've been outed lol.

Stay tuned.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick61 View Post
One of the members here is working on just such a thing. There may end up being a couple of options, at least.

ETA: I forgot you go by Macho Hambre here, LOL.
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 06, 2018, 11:27   #30
garandguy10
Registered
 
garandguy10's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 10840
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: some where
Posts: 3,637
M1 Garands are still legal in California in their original configuration..... Just sayin......
garandguy10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 06, 2018, 13:21   #31
Macho Hambre
Member
Silver Contributor
 
Macho Hambre's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74801
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 90
Already have the M1 Garand bases more than covered which is why I drifted into the FAL sphere of this addiction lol. Now back to the CMP boards you go!


Quote:
Originally Posted by garandguy10 View Post
M1 Garands are still legal in California in their original configuration..... Just sayin......
Macho Hambre is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2018 The FAL Files