The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapon Specific Forums > The AR Files

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 12, 2018, 07:02   #1
Bubacus
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 13971
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,656
Franklin Armory Reformation 11.5" Non NFA comming soon

Very interesting. I'm not sure how they pulled this rabbit out a hat, but I guess Franklin Armory will be giving out details soon:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...o-sbr-11-5-ar/


__________________
Bubacus
Bubacus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 12, 2018, 07:10   #2
LYCAN
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 20840
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 976
Thumbs up

LYCAN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 09:19   #3
2barearms
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
2barearms's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 13866
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 13,963
So it's an air rifle.......no caliber mentioned that's sneaky.....
__________________
"Owning a Firearm doesn't make you Armed any more than owning a Guitar makes you a Musician"

Was mich nicht umbringt macht mich stärker
2barearms is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 09:23   #4
2barearms
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
2barearms's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 13866
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 13,963
Has to be a pistol.
__________________
"Owning a Firearm doesn't make you Armed any more than owning a Guitar makes you a Musician"

Was mich nicht umbringt macht mich stärker
2barearms is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 09:38   #5
munchoman
Senior Member
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 21848
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 742
Iam going with smooth bore, no 5.56, 223 shot loads that i know of

Last edited by munchoman; January 13, 2018 at 10:21.
munchoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 09:57   #6
Bubacus
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 13971
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,656
.410 shotgun? Like this:

__________________
Bubacus
Bubacus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 12:20   #7
2barearms
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
2barearms's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 13866
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 13,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubacus View Post
.410 shotgun? Like this:

Maybe.....this would allow the use of a 'bullet' but would
rule of anything beyond 100 yds
__________________
"Owning a Firearm doesn't make you Armed any more than owning a Guitar makes you a Musician"

Was mich nicht umbringt macht mich stärker
2barearms is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 12:30   #8
Falfan2017
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 79031
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Gulf Coast, MS
Posts: 619
What's the appeal here? Haven't pistol braces basically made this a non issue?
Falfan2017 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 13, 2018, 13:56   #9
LYCAN
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 20840
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falfan2017 View Post
What's the appeal here? Haven't pistol braces basically made this a non issue?
my random unsolicited theory...

It was done out of principle.

Stuff like this muddles the water even further, making SBR issue almost moot by default. Because You are correct, pistol bracee have basically made this a non-issue. But no harm in further making it a non-issue.
LYCAN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 14, 2018, 20:45   #10
Bubacus
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 13971
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,656
Guess this is getting more speculation than the JFK assassination:

__________________
Bubacus
Bubacus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 14, 2018, 22:01   #11
lockjaw
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 64904
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: michigan
Posts: 248
Hmm... well, if the rifle fired during the release of the trigger, rather than pulling the trigger, I'm not personally interested.

The concept is silly and counter-intuitive considering that it would be employed on an SBR type platform.... which is designed to be deployed in CQB type environments. Actually, that is down right scarey from a tactical standpoint.

Hopefully, there is more to this patent than the above.
lockjaw is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 14, 2018, 23:22   #12
LYCAN
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 20840
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 976
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by lockjaw View Post
Hmm... well, if the rifle fired during the release of the trigger, rather than pulling the trigger, I'm not personally interested.

The concept is silly and counter-intuitive considering that it would be employed on an SBR type platform.... which is designed to be deployed in CQB type environments. Actually, that is down right scarey from a tactical standpoint.

Hopefully, there is more to this patent than the above.
agreed, 'fire on release' only, would be bad for muscle memory and other aspects. And just simply, more Negatives - then Positives, as a concept.


Time will tell...
LYCAN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 15, 2018, 16:13   #13
GOVT1911
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 9433
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Raeford, NC
Posts: 3,875
I believe it’s simething to do with the trigger as mentioned above . M personally not interested in it, BUT I love seeing “loopholes” like this being found and utilized. Maybe this will help show some others that SBR laws are silly.
__________________
I don't make policy, I just enforce the last 300 Meters of it.
GOVT1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 10:38   #14
hueyville
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
hueyville's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74557
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Foothills of the Blueridge Mountains
Posts: 4,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by lockjaw View Post
Hmm... well, if the rifle fired during the release of the trigger, rather than pulling the trigger, I'm not personally interested.

The concept is silly and counter-intuitive considering that it would be employed on an SBR type platform.... which is designed to be deployed in CQB type environments. Actually, that is down right scarey from a tactical standpoint.

Hopefully, there is more to this patent than the above.
Three position safety. #1 Safe, #2 Single, #3, Binary. Have binary triggers in nine rifles and at least five put back for future use or resell. Know guys who have made their living with M4's and varients when if a bogey didn't drop DRT it was a problem. Reason 458 SOCOM was developed for secial ops in Somolia and 6.8 for use in war on terrorists. Sometimes need to know a guy is anchored before moving to next bad guy.

I know you say that you have been there and done that. I have not but have several very close climbing partners on SEAL Teams and Delta Force. In fast CQB tell me general rule with a 5.56 AR except for head shots put two rounds in each aggressor then move on. With 6.8 or 458 one shot and engage next. Missions where only resupply might be from another friendly or normal chain of supply have to carry a 5.56 as that's the ammo that a Marine, Ranger, or regular Army guy is going to throw over to you when your load out runs low.

Also have another few hundred yards effective accurate range with 5.56 in field. In an insertion with quick extraction urban mission they often choose the 6.8 for more efficient first shot kills. Have let two play with my binary rifles and in just a matter of minutes they were smiling as each touch of trigger put a double tap on target.

I do not have binary triggers in any non standard larger caliber AR's. My wife's pair of 5.7×28's and most of my 5.56 SBR's have binary triggers and it's a nice feature once you learn it's use. With 6.8 don't need double taps so they don't get them. If need suppressive fire even my wife can flip to binary and run a pile of rounds down range accurately with binary trigger.

How much time do you have on binary systems? It's really not much different than three shot burst fire control system. I seldom use them for barrel smoking mag dumps but if need can run 450 rpm mag dump and in single fire mode they are very nice and crisp four pound triggers. I dislike overly expensive triggers. It's why I have very few Geissele two stage triggers and similar anymore. Can tune a single stage trigger to under 3 pounds with no creep or travel.

Yes, still train on doing double taps using trigger control on standard triggers but the binary are fine triggers if know how to use them. They are not dangerous as after squeeze of shot in binary and decide don't want a second round to fire on trigger release just flip safety to single or safe and rifle doesn't fire when release trigger. If zombies come in my house while wife is alone she will automatically flip either a 5.56 or 5.7 (whichever is closest) into binary mode and make sure each zombie has two sucking chest wounds as transitions without having to concentrate as hard on double tapping. It's a fine system if used correctly.
__________________
A time will come when people will not listen to accurate teachings. Instead, they will follow their own desires and surround themselves with teachers who tell them what they want to hear. 2 Timothy 4:3 G.W.T.
"If it is worth doing once...it's worth doing it a few more times to get it right." Stimpsonjcat
hueyville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 10:54   #15
wanneroo
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 74891
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tioga County, PA
Posts: 1,152
It's probably just a 410 shotgun.
wanneroo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 14:00   #16
notfrommt
Veteran Member
Silver Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 66655
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,230
Should probably start a pool on how soon ATF reverses this decision.


Save your receipt!
notfrommt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 15:08   #17
KoKodog
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 31665
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: on top of a wind swept ridge
Posts: 4,603
just keep popcorn and cold beverages close and ready ........
__________________
Far better it is to dare mighty things,
than to take refuge with those timid spirits
that know neither victory, nor defeat.
Teddy Roosvelt

Pray for peace, but prepare for war.
Winston Churchill
KoKodog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 15:26   #18
NFADLR
curmudgeon
Bronze Contributor
 
NFADLR's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 7480
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Location thats the question ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posts: 4,405
Anyone have linkage to where this BATFE decision was published ?

IE can anyone do this or is it limited to Franklin Armory ?

FA states this is new technology looks to me its just a barrel length, not talking about the binary trigger.

So I can't build an 80% AR lower into a firearm unless it has the binary only trigger.





Quote:
Originally Posted by notfrommt View Post
Should probably start a pool on how soon ATF reverses this decision.


Save your receipt!
__________________
"Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges."
http://www.highvibrations.org/archiv...1;ɪŋ
WTS: MINT FN FAL 50.63
http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=411469
#MakeFoodGreatAgain

Last edited by NFADLR; January 16, 2018 at 16:25.
NFADLR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 17:21   #19
MistWolf
Registered
 
MistWolf's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 7435
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,799
The exception has nothing to do with triggers, smooth bores or trick rifling. It's about the OAL. They point out that the Reformation has an 11.5" barrel. Do you know what the OAL of an AR is with an 11.5" barrel, carbine RE, bare muzzle and no stock? 26 inches.

Do you know what the minimum OAL of a pistol needs to be before a vertical forgrip can be install without creating an AOW? 26 inches. At this point, the weapon becomes an unconcealable firearm. As long as you don't conceal it, a handgun that's 26 inches or longer can legally have a VFG.

I think Franklin Armory convinced the ATF that since that at 26 inches or more, a handgun becomes a unconcealable firearm that's not a rifle or a shotgun, it should be legal to mount a stock on it without making it an SBR.
__________________
I should have followed my childhood dream of becoming a Mad Storyteller
MistWolf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 18:01   #20
hueyville
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
hueyville's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74557
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Foothills of the Blueridge Mountains
Posts: 4,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by NFADLR View Post
Anyone have linkage to where this BATFE decision was published ? IE can anyone do this or is it limited to Franklin Armory ?

FA states this is new technology looks to me its just a barrel length, not talking about the binary trigger. So I can't build an 80% AR lower into a firearm unless it has the binary only trigger.
Same questions I have? Where is the "new technology" I see a short barrel upper on a rifle lower. What trigger pack is in it should not have any bearing. As easy as it is to flip uppers and lowers back and forth from rifles to pistol with braces, makes no sense to have any barrel length rules.

Man can build a few AR pistols, a few rifles and in under a minute could throw an pistol upper on a rifle lower. Then in less than another minute could put it back. That said, with a brace it doesn't even matter. BATFE needs to apply a little common sense. Feds need to have at least another period where Form 4 transferable machine guns can be built for the market and clean up the C&R guns. Just put them all on on Form 4's and let responsible people buy what they want at an affordable price.

Can build a 14.7" rifle with pinned quick change suppressor adapter or pin a suppressor on a 11.5" or 12.5" barrel and have a legal single stamp SBR. Or build same gun as pistol with brace and use quick change cans. Basically there are a dozen ways to skin the same cat now. I can run my binary AR rifles as fast as I can a select fire M4 accurately. Binary triggers have changed the game for me.

Soon as I can get one of the binary trigger packs for H&K's will have at least one, probably two. Will then hunt down a belt fed receiver for one of my H&K 91's, add the binary trigger pack and instant HK21 with no form. Guarantee from behind good cover with a nice long belt only the most experienced combat veteran would be able to tell it's not a Form 4 belt fed machine gun but just a high dollar rifle with a $600 trigger pack thats burning rounds into their position.

Too many Slidefire stocks, binary triggers already out in circulation to put the genie back in the bottle. Not to mention with about $1 worth of hardware from most people parts bins can build a bump stock, can use a shoelace to turn a M1a, Mini 14 or M1 Garrand into a full auto. External thread flash hiders that accept a myriad of fuel and oil filters abound on the market. If a man was so inclined could build his rifles with external thread flash hiders, install binary triggers, put three or four cases of fuel filters for heavy trucks in storage shed and have sidestepped all registration regulations for day it's fight or die.

Personally like my nice quick change Form 4 cans and other well designed cans and paying for a tax stamp doesn't bother me, just the wait considering have so many Form 4's it should be a very quick process to add more. Why should it take a year to get a Form processed when have a vault full of Form 4 items already. Glad I sold all but three form 4 machine guns. Will likely keep the AC 556 and M11's for life just because the Mini 14 GB folder is so compact and the sub two second mag dumps with the M11's are fun on occasion and cost to burn 380 is almost nothing. It's almost mind blowing to know that they put out over 3,000 foot pounds of energy per second.
__________________
A time will come when people will not listen to accurate teachings. Instead, they will follow their own desires and surround themselves with teachers who tell them what they want to hear. 2 Timothy 4:3 G.W.T.
"If it is worth doing once...it's worth doing it a few more times to get it right." Stimpsonjcat
hueyville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16, 2018, 23:02   #21
Impala_Guy
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 55819
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gamecock Country
Posts: 2,339
I don't know why anybody wants a 5.56 sbr in the first place, you're just robbing the cartridge of its only asset, velocity. Is there any advantage to clipping 4 or 5 inches off a barrel or is it just the cool factor in the look it creates? A Tavor is shorter than an SBR anyway.
__________________
Don't spread our wealth around, spread our work ethic.........

Last edited by Impala_Guy; January 16, 2018 at 23:21.
Impala_Guy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17, 2018, 00:10   #22
Stoney
Former 0311
Contributor
Bronze Contributor
 
Stoney's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 1205
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brush Prairie, WA USA
Posts: 5,177
and don't forget the rubber-band
__________________
Stoney
Has freedom been replaced with Free-Dumb.

Illegitimi non carborundum

A 1911A1 is like a Glock, except it's for grownups.

AMERICA! Designed by geniuses. Now run by idiots.

"The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen." Thank God for the United States Marine Corps!"
Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945

Old Viking saying: Never be more then two steps from your weapon

Flying is a hard way to earn an easy living.
Stoney is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17, 2018, 05:51   #23
nwobhm
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
nwobhm's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 9580
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 8,869
How difficult would it be to manufacture a smooth bore with a rifled 556 or 308 slug?
nwobhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17, 2018, 14:23   #24
hueyville
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
hueyville's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 74557
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Foothills of the Blueridge Mountains
Posts: 4,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoney View Post
and don't forget the rubber-band
I was trying to keep one secret and there you go ruining the whole thing!

Impala guy, SBR built for lobbing large heavy subsonic ammo does not rob rifle of anything. Also there are guys that can ring the 1,000 yard gong with a 12.5" 5.56 with good barrel like Noveske turns out. Personally I prefer an 18" barrel but my 13.7" Novese, 13.5" White Oaks are all way sub MOA and very compact even with a suppressor.
__________________
A time will come when people will not listen to accurate teachings. Instead, they will follow their own desires and surround themselves with teachers who tell them what they want to hear. 2 Timothy 4:3 G.W.T.
"If it is worth doing once...it's worth doing it a few more times to get it right." Stimpsonjcat
hueyville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17, 2018, 20:32   #25
ddbtoth
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 3495
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 399
Quote:
Originally Posted by MistWolf View Post
The exception has nothing to do with triggers, smooth bores or trick rifling. It's about the OAL. They point out that the Reformation has an 11.5" barrel. Do you know what the OAL of an AR is with an 11.5" barrel, carbine RE, bare muzzle and no stock? 26 inches.

Do you know what the minimum OAL of a pistol needs to be before a vertical forgrip can be install without creating an AOW? 26 inches. At this point, the weapon becomes an unconcealable firearm. As long as you don't conceal it, a handgun that's 26 inches or longer can legally have a VFG.

I think Franklin Armory convinced the ATF that since that at 26 inches or more, a handgun becomes a unconcealable firearm that's not a rifle or a shotgun, it should be legal to mount a stock on it without making it an SBR.
So an 11.5 upper with a stock is just as legal as the Franklin? Just make sure the flash hider doesn't screw up the OAL? That seems to easy.
ddbtoth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17, 2018, 22:01   #26
MistWolf
Registered
 
MistWolf's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 7435
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddbtoth View Post
So an 11.5 upper with a stock is just as legal as the Franklin?
That's what I'm hoping for.
__________________
I should have followed my childhood dream of becoming a Mad Storyteller
MistWolf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 14:41   #27
NFADLR
curmudgeon
Bronze Contributor
 
NFADLR's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 7480
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Location thats the question ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posts: 4,405
Yes that would be nice but how can they patent a configuration?

Anyone check us patent office ?

Or BATF for a so called determination or ruling ?
site:https://www.atf.gov/ Franklyn armory
I
Aren't rulings public domain?


Quote:
Originally Posted by MistWolf View Post
That's what I'm hoping for.
__________________
"Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges."
http://www.highvibrations.org/archiv...1;ɪŋ
WTS: MINT FN FAL 50.63
http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=411469
#MakeFoodGreatAgain
NFADLR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:44   #28
MistWolf
Registered
 
MistWolf's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 7435
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,799
Read their press release carefully. Nowhere did they say anything about the exception being allowed by anything they have patented. They said they would be using patented stuff to make a new category of AR.
__________________
I should have followed my childhood dream of becoming a Mad Storyteller
MistWolf is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2018 The FAL Files