The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapons Discussion > Optics

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 30, 2017, 14:53   #1
paulo
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 11856
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Troy Wisconsin
Posts: 413
NightForce ATACR

Any thoughts on the ACTAR 5-25 X 56? First or second focal plane? Don't really use the current scope for ranging.
Currently have a NXS 5.5-22 X 50. Is it worth the up-grade?

Thanks
paulo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 30, 2017, 15:22   #2
CG&L
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 27951
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pine Grove, La.
Posts: 2,309
I chose the NXS 5.5x22x50 over the ATACR and really don't see the ATACR as an upgrade to the NXS. Is there an advantage to a 34mm tube over a 30mm?

It really boils down to what you want the scope for. You already have the NXS employed on a rifle. Where is it lacking?
That answer would be the determining factor.
__________________
RIP shlomo

Last edited by CG&L; December 31, 2017 at 09:46.
CG&L is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 31, 2017, 06:38   #3
paulo
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 11856
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Troy Wisconsin
Posts: 413
I've never looked through ED glass, just wondering if the ED glass was worth the extra cost?
paulo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 31, 2017, 09:32   #4
CG&L
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 27951
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pine Grove, La.
Posts: 2,309
It appears you like the Nightforce line-up of scopes and would like to give the ATACR a try.

The worst that can happen is you'll end up with a most excellent scope. You'll also end up with first-hand experience with the ACTAR compared to the NXS.

As always, there's a point of diminishing returns with everything. Is the ATACR on the downward slope? Of course it is, just like everything else.

You're trying to justify the extra expense, this is not the right way to do things. I say, buy the ATACR
You'll be dead sooner or later and that little extra you paid for the ATACR will mean nothing
__________________
RIP shlomo

Last edited by CG&L; December 31, 2017 at 09:45.
CG&L is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 31, 2017, 10:11   #5
gunplumber
Arrogant Bastard
Gold Contributor
 
gunplumber's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 96
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 24,215
been wondering the same. I have used the NXS and loved it, but had to sell it to finance something more important. Now I just have a MkIV Leupy 10x and a SHV 2.5x10. I think the NXS was better than the SHV (other than the illumination vs not), but I really need the two side by side, which is not possible right now. I assume it's better, but if I cannot discern the difference in quality, because of my eyesight, is it worth paying double?

Then the ATACR is around $500 more.

I have been looking at replacing the NXS that I sold, or getting a ATACR in 4x14. I understand mathematically the 34mm tube is better, but in practice? I see the main benefit is it being almost 2" shorter.
__________________
T. Mark Graham, Master Gunsmith
Arizona Response Systems, LLC
gunplumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 31, 2017, 12:58   #6
tac-40
Moderator
Armed Curmudgeon
 
tac-40's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 12090
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SC-Low Country
Posts: 7,457
Mark hit the nail on the head. Why pay for something that you cannot, because of physical limitations, utilize to the fullest extent, while owning something that currently does (at a much cheaper price)?

Think of audio equipment; why pay $5000 for a system that performs far beyond your hearing capabilities when a $500 system gives you good performance just beyond your limits?
__________________
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you. Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Schools uses to start with the "three R's". Reading, writing, and arithmetic. Now they start with the "three D's". Dipshitery, Dumbassery, and Douchebaggery-Retired Bum

If you do in fact have a problem, you have the rest of your life to solve it. How long your life lasts only depends on how well you solve it.
tac-40 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 31, 2017, 19:44   #7
paulo
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 11856
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Troy Wisconsin
Posts: 413
Points well taken.
Thanks
paulo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 04, 2018, 16:59   #8
55bird
Veteran Member
Silver Contributor
 
55bird's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 799
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Petersburg, Fl
Posts: 1,438
Using my experience in Amateur Astronomy optics that spans 50 years ED glass excels over standard achromatic objective lenses and in eye pieces but is pricey. Is color and fine detail at higher powers necessary? You choose. This will be more pronounced at low light levels. But then my eyes are fading from age and I wouldn't know anymore either at this point in time.
__________________
The very things my grade school teachers of the 1960's warned me about communism,my government is today
55bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2018 The FAL Files