My first FAL, a Congo.

**lowIQ** · December 12, 2017, 21:51

Very glad to report that I just scored my very first Fal. It's a DSA SA58 Congo (18" barrel) model . The seller claims it has a forged upper receiver but I honestly have no idea if it does. Truth be told i won't be too disappointed if it doesn't. The rifle is in excellent condition. According to DSA data, the serial number shows it was manufactured in Oct/2012.

For the last 3 years I'd been patiently waiting for a great deal on a 18" Para but I just never came across one. I have a deep lust for a Para so I'm definitely considering the conversion kit from DSA, but I'll wait to put a few hundred rounds down the range before I commit.

If you guyz see anything suspicious in the photos, please feel free to comment. I'm a newby but I'm looking forward to learning as much as I can from the Forum.

For now, here's a few recent pics of the rifle..:

**cavegeo** · December 12, 2017, 21:55

Nice looking rifle.

steveTA1983 · December 12, 2017, 22:58

DSxxxxxxx serial equals forged

DSAxxxxxxx serial equals cast

Capt D · December 12, 2017, 23:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveTA1983

DSxxxxxxx serial equals forged

DSAxxxxxxx serial equals cast

DS = forged yes
DSA = some are forged, many not so much (have to call DSA with serial# to verify)

**lowIQ** · December 12, 2017, 23:19

Regarding the receiver, I'll call and verify with DSA. My rifle was manufactured in 2012 and has a S# in the low 25K.

Numerous searches tonight have uncovered information suggesting DSA started manufacturing Cast receivers with serial #s in the 29K mark, which were first fabricated and entered the stream of commerce in late 2014 to mid 2015 time frame.

Of course, the info was obtained from the internet. I'm certainly not suggesting this is factual data.

No big whoop if mine turns out to be Cast.

I'm here to learn and to share my experience with my acute onset of Congolitis.

Ghost · December 12, 2017, 23:47

I'm betting on cast. My reason is the DSA logo on the ejection side. I noticed that they changed from no outline, to fine line double wall logo, then on the cast one I have it is a much thicker heavier double walled logo, like pi tured here. If you k ow what to look for you can find the signs ofcasting in some places,such as th iside of the mag well, helps to have a known forged for comparison if you dont know what to look for.

**lowIQ** · December 12, 2017, 23:58

Roger that, Ghost.

Heck, at this point I just want the darn stick to run well. Everything else is just gravy.

EinheitElf · December 13, 2017, 01:25

Looks nice!

Couple things-
Izzy mag release
Stg gas plug
Izzy(?) pivot screw assy
Semi auto selector,has the 'beak'
Looks to be a bipod cut barrel...

lew · December 13, 2017, 11:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by EinheitElf

Looks nice!

Couple things-
Izzy mag release
Stg gas plug
Izzy(?) pivot screw assy
Semi auto selector,has the 'beak'
Looks to be a bipod cut barrel...

Those are all stock DSA parts patterned off of the parts you mentioned.

At any rate, cast or forged, who cares? Great looking rifle. Now shoot the shit out it.

1911Ron · December 13, 2017, 14:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by lew

At any rate, cast or forged, who cares? Great looking rifle. Now shoot the shit out it.

I agree SHOOT it!!!!

On the Para conversion, i had gone back and forth on converting my riFal and in the end i stuck with the standard stock as i really had no reason to fold the stock, now if you just want the cool factor why not eh? The biggest thing is to SHOOT it!

**oleblu72** · December 13, 2017, 14:56

I have a SA58 with a 18" fluted barrel and its birth date is the low 27's and according to DSA its listed as forged.

Mark

**lowIQ** · December 13, 2017, 20:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by lew

... Now shoot the shit out it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1911Ron

...The biggest thing is to SHOOT it!

I intend do this, most definitely.

**lowIQ** · December 13, 2017, 20:07

Close-up photo of port side.

ghf · December 14, 2017, 09:36

I have several DSA Para conversion units on different metric FALs (DSA and Imbel receivered).
All went on correctly and function perfectly. No hassles.

**Thomas** · December 14, 2017, 10:00

I built a para with 18 inch barrel. Love it. Not correct for history, but shoot one. Mine shoots better that my full length.
All my parts are Imbel, so all fit.

lew · December 14, 2017, 12:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1911Ron

On the Para conversion, i had gone back and forth on converting my riFal and in the end i stuck with the standard stock as i really had no reason to fold the stock, now if you just want the cool factor why not eh? The biggest thing is to SHOOT it!

Everyone needs at least one Para.

**lowIQ** · December 14, 2017, 13:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghf

...I have several DSA Para conversion units on different metric FALs. All went on correctly and function perfectly. No hassles.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas

...I built a para with 18 inch barrel. Love it. Mine shoots better that my full length.

Very encouraging reports. Thank you.

nwobhm · December 14, 2017, 15:00

May be to your benefit to call DSA and see if that lower is on the recall list.

01BIRDDOG · December 14, 2017, 15:02

Very nice....I had one just like it and sold it here and really miss it now. Shoot and enjoy.

**Hebrew Battle Rifle** · December 14, 2017, 18:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by nwobhm

May be to your benefit to call DSA and see if that lower is on the recall list.

That is excellent counsel. That groove cut by the selector detent is pretty deep.

**lowIQ** · December 14, 2017, 19:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by nwobhm

...May be to your benefit to call DSA and see if that lower is on the recall list.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hebrew Battle Rifle

...That is excellent counsel. That groove cut by the selector detent is pretty deep.

Interesting. Will someone please chime in and explain the potential issues associated with the recall and/or the selector ..?

Thank you.

**Tgeorgi2002** · December 14, 2017, 21:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowIQ

Interesting. Will someone please chime in and explain the potential issues associated with the recall and/or the selector ..?

Thank you.

https://www.dsarms.com/t-safetynotice.aspx

**lowIQ** · December 15, 2017, 20:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tgeorgi2002

https://www.dsarms.com/t-safetynotice.aspx

Thank you for the link. This issue is somewhat moot for me as the entire lower will most likely be replaced with a para conversion kit from DSA. Should I decide otherwise I’ll definitely look into this a little closer.

Invictus77 · December 15, 2017, 21:17

I would suggest that ANY potential warranty issues (regardless of item or manufacturer) is best looked into sooner rather than later for a successful resolution. YMMV.

**lowIQ** · December 15, 2017, 21:32

I concur. If anything, just to rule out.

kalashniKEV · December 17, 2017, 19:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt D

DS = forged yes
DSA = some are forged, many not so much (have to call DSA with serial# to verify)

This. I owned a "DSA" prefix that they told me was forged.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghf

I have several DSA Para conversion units on different metric FALs (DSA and Imbel receivered).
All went on correctly and function perfectly. No hassles.

I bought a "no nose" para conversion from DSA and it was junk- front of the top cover would bind the carrier so hard you had to pogo the rifle to charge it.

The grip had pock marks like yours from the injection mold, but nastier, and a seam all around.

The weld on the Rear reinforcement tab had a "peak" to it and I minorly sliced my palm on it, noting that I would need to file it down. Before I got around to it, I somehow managed to snag it on the front of my shirt and rip a nice, big hole!

The thing was possessed by poop devlis...

**lowIQ** · December 17, 2017, 20:12

Man, what a nightmare.

**lowIQ** · December 21, 2017, 12:24

Update: My Congo was just delivered to the house,..and I’m at work. Arrggg!!

This will be a long afternoon!!

**lowIQ** · December 22, 2017, 11:24

Cosmetically, the rifle appears to be in pristine condition. Did not get a chance to do a basic takedown for inspection but will make an effort tonight. I’m afraid a range report will not be forthcoming until after the holidays.

The anticipation will probably be the death of me.

I will however try to take a few close-up glamour shots of the Congo and post them soon.

**lowIQ** · December 23, 2017, 15:21

Here we go..:

nwobhm · December 23, 2017, 17:48

Strange looking HG screw....needs a trim.

nwobhm · December 23, 2017, 17:51

Do I see an inch EB? How about a close up of the bottom of the BHO. I don't recall seeing one like that before.

MFC · December 23, 2017, 22:53

Not a DSA bolt carrier either (at least I didn't think they ever used ones without the W sand cuts)

**lowIQ** · December 24, 2017, 09:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by MFC

Not a DSA bolt carrier either (at least I didn't think they ever used ones without the W sand cuts)

My understanding is that older rifles were offered without a sand-cut BC. Mine was manufactured in 2012.

But regardless, a complete lower para kit including updated bcg will be installed in the near future. I’ll keep the thread active to document it’s transformation.

**lowIQ** · December 30, 2017, 18:36

I recently scored a nice set of metal hand guards from a fellow member. They fit perfectly. A Steyr Short FH is on the way, as well.

The only thing left to buy is the Para conversion kit but I’m undecided whether to go with the standard or railed cover. I really dig the look of a plain jane FAL Para without optics, so I’m leaning toward a standard cover.

CQB27 · December 30, 2017, 19:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowIQ

I recently scored a nice set of metal hand guards from a fellow member. They fit perfectly. A Steyr Short FH is on the way, as well.

The only thing left to buy is the Para conversion kit but I’m undecided whether to go with the standard or railed cover. I really dig the look of a plain jane FAL Para without optics, so I’m leaning toward a standard cover.

Looking good! Remember to post pics when you get the para conversion done. I picked up a DSA Para with the railed top cover and railed handguard a few months ago. I promptly traded the para lower for a Imbel standard lower, then sold the railed parts and converted it to look like yours. To each his own, lol.

**lowIQ** · December 30, 2017, 19:34

CQB27, why did the Para not appeal to you??

CQB27 · December 30, 2017, 20:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowIQ

CQB27, why did the Para not appeal to you??

I actually liked the Para look a lot. But I bought the rifle to shoot and when it comes to shooting I much prefer the standard stock. So for me it was nothing more than a personal stock preference.

**lowIQ** · December 30, 2017, 20:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by CQB27

I actually liked the Para look a lot. But I bought the rifle to shoot and when it comes to shooting I much prefer the standard stock. So for me it was nothing more than a personal stock preference.

Copy that.

The Para stock is shorter, thus shorter LOP. I assume recoil harmonics and cheek weld on a steel/aluminum tube will be considerably different from a stock made of plastic or wood. I think the top tube/comb has a slight angle down toward the butt.

**lowIQ** · January 02, 2018, 22:48

I'm reaching out for opinions as I'm a little confused as to the type of top cover the rifle has. I've seen hundred of photos and I still cannot determine if I have a Nose or No Nose cover.

The cover has a tip about 1/16" that has to be inserted into the gas piston hood but it only inserts by applying downward pressure on the cover. The subject tip is level with the top of the cover, not below the top like in the photos I've seen.

Also, the hood/walls of the gas piston hood are thick and do not appear to have a Para cut.

I know I'm not making any sense so I'll post a few photos tomorrow. I want/need to confirm before I order the Para Kit.

nwobhm · January 03, 2018, 04:48

You don't have a nose cut top cover. Those were only for paratroppers. The likelyhood is strong that you don't have a nose cut receiver either but will need a pic to verify.

**lowIQ** · January 03, 2018, 14:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by nwobhm

You don't have a nose cut top cover. Those were only for paratroppers. The likelyhood is strong that you don't have a nose cut receiver either but will need a pic to verify.

On The Nosey..! (no pun intended)

I confirmed it with DSA. No nose Top Cover.

douglas · January 03, 2018, 16:45

Sweet looking rifle. I have always liked the humpback stock.
I hope that you save the plastic hand guards as shooting a bunch of rounds at the range during summer time in Corpus the metal one tend to get plenty hot.

**Texgunner** · January 03, 2018, 17:02

Nice rifle, great pics!

**lowIQ** · January 03, 2018, 23:02

Thanks for the kind words, folks.

She's coming along pretty good. Today I received the steyr short FH that was recently purchased from a fellow member. I really like the look of it and it shortened the total length of the rifle by about an inch.

Just ordered a folding cocking handle assembly from DSA. The Para Kit will be ordered next week.

792mauser · January 04, 2018, 03:03

Purdy looking rifle.

eternal24k · January 05, 2018, 08:58

Surprised you are building into a Para and added the metal handguards.

I think the lighter HGs balance a lot better on a para

**lowIQ** · January 05, 2018, 12:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by eternal24k

Surprised you are building into a Para and added the metal handguards.

I think the lighter HGs balance a lot better on a para

I don't know what it is about the metal HGs, but I really like the look.

Only major drawback as already mentioned by a fellow member, is heat retention and So. Texas summers are hotter than the deepest pit in hell..!!

moonbat60 · January 06, 2018, 09:42

Regarding Paras, if you dont’t like the feel of cheekweld against the metal tube of the Para’s buttstock, wrap some fabric around it, or paracord or, like I did, go to a home improvement store and look for some of this grey pipe insulation
foam.

It makes quite a bit of a difference.

I run my Para with a DSA railed top cover and like it lots.

**lowIQ** · January 06, 2018, 11:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by moonbat60

Regarding Paras, if you dont’t like the feel of cheekweld against the metal tube of the Para’s buttstock, wrap some fabric around it, or paracord or, like I did, go to a home improvement store and look for some of this grey pipe insulation
foam.

It makes quite a bit of a difference.

I run my Para with a DSA railed top cover and like it lots.

Hey Moon. Thank you very much for the advice!

Full disclosure: I actually have a side biz making/selling cheek risers for the Beretta ARX 100/160 model rifles. Mine are the only riser(s) currently availble for the Beretta.

I intend to incorporate some the features found on my “CR2 risers”, into the development of a cheek rest specifically designed for the Para Stock.

The prototype (FP1) will be unveiled in this Thread in the near future.

December 12, 2017, 21:51	#1
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	My first FAL, a Congo. Very glad to report that I just scored my very first Fal. It's a DSA SA58 Congo (18" barrel) model . The seller claims it has a forged upper receiver but I honestly have no idea if it does. Truth be told i won't be too disappointed if it doesn't. The rifle is in excellent condition. According to DSA data, the serial number shows it was manufactured in Oct/2012. For the last 3 years I'd been patiently waiting for a great deal on a 18" Para but I just never came across one. I have a deep lust for a Para so I'm definitely considering the conversion kit from DSA, but I'll wait to put a few hundred rounds down the range before I commit. If you guyz see anything suspicious in the photos, please feel free to comment. I'm a newby but I'm looking forward to learning as much as I can from the Forum. For now, here's a few recent pics of the rifle..: __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 12, 2017, 21:55	#2
cavegeo Senior Member Contributor FALaholic #: 11441 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Central Florida Posts: 911	Nice looking rifle. __________________ The whole point of being governed by a Constitution and not by men or directly by the people themselves was to stop incredible stupidity from annihilating our Freedoms. Tyranny of the majority is just as dangerous as any dictator. Especially when the majority is incredibly ******* stupid.

December 12, 2017, 23:19	#5
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Regarding the receiver, I'll call and verify with DSA. My rifle was manufactured in 2012 and has a S# in the low 25K. Numerous searches tonight have uncovered information suggesting DSA started manufacturing Cast receivers with serial #s in the 29K mark, which were first fabricated and entered the stream of commerce in late 2014 to mid 2015 time frame. Of course, the info was obtained from the internet. I'm certainly not suggesting this is factual data. No big whoop if mine turns out to be Cast. I'm here to learn and to share my experience with my acute onset of Congolitis. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 12, 2017, 23:58	#7
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Roger that, Ghost. Heck, at this point I just want the darn stick to run well. Everything else is just gravy. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 13, 2017, 20:07	#13
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Close-up photo of port side. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 12, 2017, 22:58	#3
steveTA1983 Registered FALaholic #: 80139 Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Lake in the hills, IL Posts: 147	DSxxxxxxx serial equals forged DSAxxxxxxx serial equals cast

December 12, 2017, 23:47	#6
Ghost Registered FALaholic #: 1273 Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Colorado/Utah Posts: 1,332	I'm betting on cast. My reason is the DSA logo on the ejection side. I noticed that they changed from no outline, to fine line double wall logo, then on the cast one I have it is a much thicker heavier double walled logo, like pi tured here. If you k ow what to look for you can find the signs ofcasting in some places,such as th iside of the mag well, helps to have a known forged for comparison if you dont know what to look for.

December 13, 2017, 01:25	#8
EinheitElf Registered FALaholic #: 21533 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Around here somewhere Posts: 3,387	Looks nice! Couple things- Izzy mag release Stg gas plug Izzy(?) pivot screw assy Semi auto selector,has the 'beak' Looks to be a bipod cut barrel...

December 13, 2017, 14:56	#11
oleblu72 Veteran Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 29908 Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: fowler oh. Posts: 1,775	I have a SA58 with a 18" fluted barrel and its birth date is the low 27's and according to DSA its listed as forged. Mark

December 14, 2017, 09:36	#14
ghf Registered FALaholic #: 15873 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Georgia Posts: 546	I have several DSA Para conversion units on different metric FALs (DSA and Imbel receivered). All went on correctly and function perfectly. No hassles.

December 14, 2017, 10:00	#15
Thomas Senior Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 7451 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Central Kentucky Posts: 898	18 barrel I built a para with 18 inch barrel. Love it. Not correct for history, but shoot one. Mine shoots better that my full length. All my parts are Imbel, so all fit. __________________ Who am I to Judge.

December 14, 2017, 15:00	#18
nwobhm ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ FALaholic #: 9580 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,915	May be to your benefit to call DSA and see if that lower is on the recall list.

December 14, 2017, 15:02	#19
01BIRDDOG Registered FALaholic #: 54639 Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Southwest Virginia---Abingdon, Virginia Posts: 1,818	Very nice....I had one just like it and sold it here and really miss it now. Shoot and enjoy.

December 15, 2017, 21:17	#24
Invictus77 1C 16:13 Bronze Contributor FALaholic #: 74205 Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Western, KY Posts: 5,655	I would suggest that ANY potential warranty issues (regardless of item or manufacturer) is best looked into sooner rather than later for a successful resolution. YMMV. __________________ A 9 mm "might" expand A 45 will NEVER shrink!!

December 15, 2017, 21:32	#25
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	I concur. If anything, just to rule out. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 17, 2017, 20:12	#27
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Man, what a nightmare. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 21, 2017, 12:24	#28
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Update: My Congo was just delivered to the house,..and I’m at work. Arrggg!! This will be a long afternoon!! __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 22, 2017, 11:24	#29
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Cosmetically, the rifle appears to be in pristine condition. Did not get a chance to do a basic takedown for inspection but will make an effort tonight. I’m afraid a range report will not be forthcoming until after the holidays. The anticipation will probably be the death of me. I will however try to take a few close-up glamour shots of the Congo and post them soon. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 23, 2017, 15:21	#30
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Here we go..: __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 23, 2017, 17:48	#31
nwobhm ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ FALaholic #: 9580 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,915	Strange looking HG screw....needs a trim.

December 23, 2017, 17:51	#32
nwobhm ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ FALaholic #: 9580 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,915	Do I see an inch EB? How about a close up of the bottom of the BHO. I don't recall seeing one like that before.

December 23, 2017, 22:53	#33
MFC Registered FALaholic #: 74731 Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Albuquerque, NM Posts: 137	Not a DSA bolt carrier either (at least I didn't think they ever used ones without the W sand cuts)

December 30, 2017, 18:36	#35
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	I recently scored a nice set of metal hand guards from a fellow member. They fit perfectly. A Steyr Short FH is on the way, as well. The only thing left to buy is the Para conversion kit but I’m undecided whether to go with the standard or railed cover. I really dig the look of a plain jane FAL Para without optics, so I’m leaning toward a standard cover. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

December 30, 2017, 19:34	#37
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	CQB27, why did the Para not appeal to you?? __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

January 02, 2018, 22:48	#40
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	I'm reaching out for opinions as I'm a little confused as to the type of top cover the rifle has. I've seen hundred of photos and I still cannot determine if I have a Nose or No Nose cover. The cover has a tip about 1/16" that has to be inserted into the gas piston hood but it only inserts by applying downward pressure on the cover. The subject tip is level with the top of the cover, not below the top like in the photos I've seen. Also, the hood/walls of the gas piston hood are thick and do not appear to have a Para cut. I know I'm not making any sense so I'll post a few photos tomorrow. I want/need to confirm before I order the Para Kit. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

January 03, 2018, 04:48	#41
nwobhm ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ FALaholic #: 9580 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: USA Posts: 8,915	You don't have a nose cut top cover. Those were only for paratroppers. The likelyhood is strong that you don't have a nose cut receiver either but will need a pic to verify.

January 03, 2018, 16:45	#43
douglas Registered FALaholic #: 22985 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 654	Sweet looking rifle. I have always liked the humpback stock. I hope that you save the plastic hand guards as shooting a bunch of rounds at the range during summer time in Corpus the metal one tend to get plenty hot. __________________ Front Sight....Front Sight...Front Sight...Only Hits Counts.

January 03, 2018, 17:02	#44
Texgunner long-time Texas taxpayer Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 4653 Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Brokenoak in central Texas-Milam county Posts: 7,119	Nice rifle, great pics! __________________ My daddy was a cowboy in his younger days, wild as the west Texas wind. He once told me, "Son, death is a horse you got to ride. So you better get your saddle ready."

January 03, 2018, 23:02	#45
lowIQ Member Silver Contributor FALaholic #: 75383 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Corpus Christi, Texas Posts: 91	Thanks for the kind words, folks. She's coming along pretty good. Today I received the steyr short FH that was recently purchased from a fellow member. I really like the look of it and it shortened the total length of the rifle by about an inch. Just ordered a folding cocking handle assembly from DSA. The Para Kit will be ordered next week. __________________ What we've got here is failure to communicate.

January 04, 2018, 03:03	#46
792mauser Registered FALaholic #: 33607 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Phx AZ Posts: 221	Purdy looking rifle. __________________ Omae O Korosu

January 05, 2018, 08:58	#47
eternal24k Registered FALaholic #: 26370 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: VT Posts: 310	Surprised you are building into a Para and added the metal handguards. I think the lighter HGs balance a lot better on a para

January 06, 2018, 09:42	#49
moonbat60 Registered FALaholic #: 17000 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Midwest Posts: 5,176	Regarding Paras, if you dont’t like the feel of cheekweld against the metal tube of the Para’s buttstock, wrap some fabric around it, or paracord or, like I did, go to a home improvement store and look for some of this grey pipe insulation foam. It makes quite a bit of a difference. I run my Para with a DSA railed top cover and like it lots.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode