The FAL Files  

Go Back   The FAL Files > Weapons Discussion > Optics

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 11, 2012, 10:34   #1
johnmac
Veteran Member
Bronze Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 17274
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,031
Leupold 1.5-4x20 Mark AR Duplex Riflescope?

Anyone have any intel or experience with this scope? Would be used on an AR15 M4 Flatop.

Also recommendations on QD rings/base for this set up?

Thanks for the help!
__________________
For God so loved the world....
......He didn't send a committee.
johnmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 11, 2012, 13:37   #2
HighRatMaster
Registered
Bronze Contributor
 
HighRatMaster's Avatar
 
FALaholic #: 19296
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oleta CA USA
Posts: 1,935
I have one, for what I paid it's fine. I have it on a Para and haven't had any problems. In a side by side comparison it is not as bright and clear as a Vari-XIII 1.5-5 or a Bushnell 4200 1.5-5 but it's way ahead of a Millet or other cheapo. I would buy another if I had a use for it. HTH
__________________
Support a Soldier http://www.supportasoldier.com/

It doesn't matter what you miss them with.

"You in or out?" "I'll take his legs."
HighRatMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17, 2012, 13:18   #3
stormboy297
Registered
 
FALaholic #: 64073
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NEGeorgia
Posts: 21
I've had one for about a year on my fal and no probs; Can't beat the quality of a leupold for this kind of money. My only problem is the reticle and 1.5x power being the lowest; why not 1x? I chose it first for the size and the weight going on an fal. I'm going with the burris tac30 next for my ar.
stormboy297 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17, 2012, 14:59   #4
J. Armstrong
Minister of Amusement
Gold Contributor
 
FALaholic #: 13629
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 9,436
Just got one, mounted it but haven't shot it yet. Looks good so far.
I especially like the longer eye relief which works well with a para rear sight. On some other scopes, even with the ocular back almost touching the rear sight, i end up with my nose touching the stock knuckle. Not a problem with the sliding type rear sight where there is a little more room to bring the scope back, but annoying on a para. Should note I use low QD rings, which avoids the need for a cheekrest.
As above, seems like a good value for the dollar. I'm pleased.
__________________
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools" Herbert Spenser

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

I respect the government only in the sense that I respect any other dangerous predator who views me as food.
J. Armstrong is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©1998-2012 The FAL Files