mmk119
November 11, 2011, 17:36
I understand under the new amended Law Enforcement Officer's Safety Act, that former law enforcement officers only need 10 years of honorable service to qualify now. It appears that the term "qualified retired Officer" no longer exists and has been replaced with "qualified separated officer". So that now a retired officer is only one of several categories of "qualified separated law enforcement officers". I also understand that the law has no enforceable requirement placed upon any agency; so, that an agency does not have to certifiy officers under the standards. Certifying officers appears to be voluntary even though accepting the certifications that have been issued from other states is required.
My question is this: If an agency does choose to certify officers under the new amended act, can they pick and choose who they certify? For instance, can they choose to only certify retired officers and refuse to certify all others in the category; or must they certify all or none?
If the later is the case, where is the legal justification to require this? Case law cites please (fed and State)?
How are your departments handling this?
thanks,
M
My question is this: If an agency does choose to certify officers under the new amended act, can they pick and choose who they certify? For instance, can they choose to only certify retired officers and refuse to certify all others in the category; or must they certify all or none?
If the later is the case, where is the legal justification to require this? Case law cites please (fed and State)?
How are your departments handling this?
thanks,
M