PDA

View Full Version : Smuggled video of taliban stoning woman to death and executing couple


WarriorPoet
October 23, 2010, 21:36
Every female libtard in the U.S. should be forced to watch this clip to see what "multiculturalism" will mean to them.....

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=218813

-WP

L Haney
October 23, 2010, 21:52
Silly bitch probably had an abortion. We got lots of GUYS here think about the same way. Sarcasm [off].

Ironhandjohn
October 23, 2010, 23:01
I wonder how loud the crickets chirping will be to drown out the protests of Amnesty International and other left-wing "advocacy" groups who excuse this sort of barbarism.





In the words of Co. Kilgore............" F**king savages..."

starbuck
October 24, 2010, 07:55
Thats some real ape shit.

JasonB
October 24, 2010, 08:07
Originally posted by Ironhandjohn
I wonder how loud the crickets chirping will be to drown out the protests of Amnesty International and other left-wing "advocacy" groups who excuse this sort of barbarism.





In the words of Co. Kilgore............" F**king savages..."

They don't seem too enthused with it in Iran so why do you think they will excuse it in this case?

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/iran-stoning-sentence-suspension-not-enough-2010-09-08

Deltaten
October 24, 2010, 09:04
One of the first thoughts occurring to me was that it looked like a scene from a bad, post-apocolyptic "Mad Max" retribution flick.
Second thought was that it was familiar to some of the gang vids posted to U-tube.

Both WND clips resemble feral tribes of ignorant, wasteland dwelling cruel zealots.........

oh! wait a minnit.......

nevermind!

squid8286
October 24, 2010, 09:18
What gets me more than anything is these are the very same animals that the Cocksucker in the White House wants to "negotiate" with.

leper
October 24, 2010, 09:35
they then returned to their cave to have sex with each other and goats. what are they supposed to do with the 72 virgins again??

Ironhandjohn
October 24, 2010, 10:23
Originally posted by JasonB


They don't seem too enthused with it in Iran so why do you think they will excuse it in this case?

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/iran-stoning-sentence-suspension-not-enough-2010-09-08



Because they seem to focus most of their energies on condemning(loudly) anything the USA may have had a hand in, like Gitmo, rather than the real savagery committed by our enemies around the world. Clear it up any?

molotov
October 24, 2010, 13:52
In the words of Co. Kilgore............" F**king savages..."

Hey, maybe we should send troops over there and take them for everything they got! Land, poppies and the heroin trade, pipelines.

One of the first thoughts occurring to me was that it looked like a scene from a bad, post-apocolyptic "Mad Max" retribution flick.

Or like a scene from the Ultra Orthodox quarter of Jerusalem. Lot's of places still stone people for offenses. Why do we have to police the world all the time?

It's their country, why should I care? If we are a sovereign nation and they are too, why should anyone outside the country's opinion matter on a moral issue? Sure, maybe there are those in that country who disapprove, but that's their war, not ours.

Some guys talk about how stupid multiculturalism is but here they are, expecting the world to play by and conform to their version of right and wrong, savage and civilized. Except their version of civilization is forcing it down everyone elses throat.

They sound like a bunch Romans, blind in their assuming every aspect of our society is superior to the "savages" beyond our current borders and that invading them is akin to a spiritual and political enlightenment for those who survive the ravages of war......

cpd109
October 24, 2010, 18:28
Beware of those who shout "allah akbar" or something like that in the US. It's coming (again).

JasonB
October 24, 2010, 19:02
Originally posted by Ironhandjohn




Because they seem to focus most of their energies on condemning(loudly) anything the USA may have had a hand in, like Gitmo, rather than the real savagery committed by our enemies around the world. Clear it up any?

Like things Saddam Hussein was doing to his people?

Lockbar
October 24, 2010, 20:10
The only reason american lib women would be upset is that the stoned woman didn't offer to give a B.J. to Klinton.

Ironhandjohn
October 24, 2010, 20:46
Originally posted by JasonB


Like things Saddam Hussein was doing to his people?



Well, he won't be doing it anymore, will he?

Heat
October 24, 2010, 20:59
Those a-holes struting around preparing to, and then stoning the women was insane--those guys need a little of the same treatment-Im really growing weary of seeing these islamist's-the religion is a nightmare throwback plain and simple-I was perusing youtube and came across this-scary!

one of many:
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/boI1JKrrCqM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/boI1JKrrCqM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

JasonB
October 25, 2010, 05:33
Originally posted by Ironhandjohn




Well, he won't be doing it anymore, will he?

Nope. Can't imagine why we have such a bad reputation around the world either, can you?

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/handshake300.jpg

jdluton
October 25, 2010, 10:39
Originally posted by JasonB


Nope. Can't imagine why we have such a bad reputation around the world either, can you?


Around which part of the world?
Who wants to be had in good reputation by animals such as we watched in that video?

JasonB
October 25, 2010, 16:07
Originally posted by jdluton


Around which part of the world?
Who wants to be had in good reputation by animals such as we watched in that video?


You didn't actually look at the whole picture, did you?

Sailor553
October 25, 2010, 19:43
Well.....those two won't be procreating.

Mattrico
October 25, 2010, 20:17
To quote John Rambo..."F*ck the world."

If we stopped exporting food tomorrow, over 100 countries of "the world"...most of which hate us, btw...would enter a state of famine within 1-3 months. Maybe we should do just that, to give "the world" a little attitude check.

Just sayin.'

John Culver
October 25, 2010, 22:46
Originally posted by Mattrico
To quote John Rambo..."F*ck the world."

If we stopped exporting food tomorrow, over 100 countries of "the world"...most of which hate us, btw...would enter a state of famine within 1-3 months. Maybe we should do just that, to give "the world" a little attitude check.

Just sayin.'

Not a bad idea, but we need to do a few things first

Most of our rare earth materials come from china and other unfriendlies. We need to find a domestic supply if possible and exploit it.

I can live without mandarin oranges, but their are a few foreign things we NEED.

Ironhandjohn
October 25, 2010, 23:16
Originally posted by Heat
Those a-holes struting around preparing to, and then stoning the women was insane--those guys need a little of the same treatment-Im really growing weary of seeing these islamist's-the religion is a nightmare throwback plain and simple-I was perusing youtube and came across this-scary!

one of many:
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/boI1JKrrCqM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/boI1JKrrCqM?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>





The term "useful idiot" jumps out at me here. What is it with these upper-class twits doing everything they can to grovel to a religion and way of life that seeks to subjugate them? Prince Charles said a few months ago that "Islam will save the world" or some such nonsense.

JasonB
October 26, 2010, 05:23
Originally posted by Mattrico
To quote John Rambo..."F*ck the world."

If we stopped exporting food tomorrow, over 100 countries of "the world"...most of which hate us, btw...would enter a state of famine within 1-3 months. Maybe we should do just that, to give "the world" a little attitude check.

Just sayin.'

Maybe you should be asking why we ever did that in the first place. By "export" I am assuming you are meaning giving away, not selling? And it isn't just food we are giving away as evidenced by the sweepstakes winner photo.

SWOHFAL
October 26, 2010, 05:56
Originally posted by John Culver


Not a bad idea, but we need to do a few things first

Most of our rare earth materials come from china and other unfriendlies. We need to find a domestic supply if possible and exploit it.

I can live without mandarin oranges, but their are a few foreign things we NEED.

Or at least find it within this hemisphere - I would pity Hugo if he denied us something we needed and we had a president who wasn't a fellow traveler with regard to ideology.

JasonB
October 26, 2010, 16:20
Originally posted by SWOHFAL


Or at least find it within this hemisphere - I would pity Hugo if he denied us something we needed and we had a president who wasn't a fellow traveler with regard to ideology.

Hugo as in Chavez? Shouldn't be a problem to keep fellow travellers in since we have been doing it for the majority of the time there has been a USA.

http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html

The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto and some of their American counterparts are...

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.

Do changing words, change the end result? ... By using different words, is it all of a sudden OK to ignore or violate the provisions or intent of the Constitution of the united States of America?????

Sailor553
October 26, 2010, 18:05
Didja see the video of those Rand Paul supporters stomping a woman?

Deltaten
October 26, 2010, 18:39
Sailor;
Why the fugg are you here; but to stir shit and troll posts??

No....really? DO you have anything to contribute in other forums; or is it only yer desire to act as our collective (left-brained) conscience?
Such a "traveler" should have travelled off to DU by now.

While I appreciate yer service; it sure as hell don;t give ya license ta barf inta any and all posts ya want.

I truly mean this in a kind way...
Fugk off! ;)

L Haney
October 26, 2010, 19:16
Originally posted by Deltaten

Such a "traveler" should have travelled off to DU by now.


I don't think the local chapter of Ducks Unlimited would be very welcoming. Mebbe other places are different.

Deltaten
October 26, 2010, 19:53
quack !

Sailor553
October 26, 2010, 20:00
Odd, folks get upset when some schmucks stone some gal in a far away land, as is their custom. But, for some reason, won't share the same outrage when the same gang mentality takes place here. No wonder this country is fukk'd up.

Back off Delta. Push and shove someone else.

JasonB
October 27, 2010, 05:22
Originally posted by Sailor553
Odd, folks get upset when some schmucks stone some gal in a far away land, as is their custom. But, for some reason, won't share the same outrage when the same gang mentality takes place here. No wonder this country is fukk'd up.

Back off Delta. Push and shove someone else.

Actually, 1 person (not plural as you stated) stomped on the woman. I will be unpleasantly surprised if he doesn't do time for it.

As for the rest, I really have no interest in someone on the other side of the world getting stoned to death beyond the very real chance that I funded the people who were involved via US foreign aid.

Ricketts
October 27, 2010, 09:06
Originally posted by Sailor553
Odd, folks get upset when some schmucks stone some gal in a far away land, as is their custom. But, for some reason, won't share the same outrage when the same gang mentality takes place here. No wonder this country is fukk'd up.

Back off Delta. Push and shove someone else.



That woman (I THINK it was a woman) was stepped on once. Looks like it really didn't do much to her.

The woman in the smuggled video actually died.

Need me to explain the difference??

Personally, I don't give a rats ass about her either except for the hypocrisy exhibited. According to you, it's fine for them to stone a woman for looking at a man. But you don't think it's OK for us to waterboard a guy that was known to have been involved in flying a plane into the WTC, killing 3000 or so.

And you think WE are fu*ked up?

JasonB
October 27, 2010, 17:42
Originally posted by Ricketts




That woman (I THINK it was a woman) was stepped on once. Looks like it really didn't do much to her.

The woman in the smuggled video actually died.

Need me to explain the difference??

Personally, I don't give a rats ass about her either except for the hypocrisy exhibited. According to you, it's fine for them to stone a woman for looking at a man. But you don't think it's OK for us to waterboard a guy that was known to have been involved in flying a plane into the WTC, killing 3000 or so.

And you think WE are fu*ked up?

It isn't fine for a woman to get stoned to death, but considering it isn't happening in the US it is hardly our concern unless our foreign aid went to fund the people executing her which is a problem that can be (and needs to be) solved by axing all foreign aid

As for the other, I assume she is a US citizen. Not sure what she was doing beforehand, but never the less she was subdued when tough guy stomped her and as a result he needs to get figuratively stomped.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20020717-503544.html

Sailor553
October 27, 2010, 22:05
You're right Ricketts, we are not stoning one another - yet.

The woman was recognized by some of the fellows in the crowd (as she had been in town nearly two weeks as part of a film crew - she had a part, hence the blonde wig) and dragged out, thrown to the ground by two of these guys, with one landing atop her, pinning her down and then she was curb stomped by a third gentleman. You might want to see the interview with the woman victim. Apparently, the local cops agree with her too.

Young women should not be allowed to attend political rallies?

Not sure what the fleck you are talking about with your water board comment. I guess you are referring to the guy that was water boarded 183 times and admitted to also flying an airplane in the Empire State Building back in the forties? Or, was it that other detainee that survived 83 water boardings? He admitted to losing the World Series amoung other deeds. These false confessions waste resource and time. Besides, all those guys that flew those planes that fatefull day are dead.

My views on that subject? Same as before, I don't think water boarding provides reliable intel. This view is also shared by some guys that I know that are still serving in intel rolls in Ashcanistan today.

SWOHFAL
October 28, 2010, 15:14
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/10/28/teen-girls-executed-somali-militant-group/?test=latestnews

Ironhandjohn
October 28, 2010, 16:10
Originally posted by SWOHFAL
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/10/28/teen-girls-executed-somali-militant-group/?test=latestnews




http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q99/Koolaktingkat04/ApclypsNow_Still_0059JPG.jpg




Once again...


" F****ing savages..."


I wonder how Tony Blair's sister-in-law feels about this....