Rothschild and CIA Publications Attack “Constitution-worshipers”

[Heat]

Rothschild and CIA Publications Attack “Constitution-worshipers”

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 25, 2010

The editors of the Economist have declared constitutionalists mentally ill. “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors wrote on September 23. “When history is turned into scripture and men into deities, truth is the victim.”
http://www.infowars.com/rothschild-and-cia-publications-attack-constitution-worshipers/

[shlomo]

Straight outta the communist handbook. Margialize the opposition as "mentally ill", which justifies the Final Solution.

[RG Coburn]

At the same time,it also erodes stature of the Constitution,implying it something antiquated,or unneccessary.

[shlomo]

Originally posted by RG Coburn
At the same time,it also erodes stature of the Constitution,implying it something antiquated,or unneccessary.

Let's just come out with it, and tell it like it is. It is an impediment to The Plan.

Oh, wait. Sorry, there's no plan. All this destructive stuff is just a string of unforunate accidents of fate.

Carry on.

[308bolt]

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XRLPG_HplrA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XRLPG_HplrA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

[V guy]

Does this mean they are against the 2nd amendment, too? Hahahahahhaa!!!

I find it hard to believe that the CIA is running a news front like the Economist.

Christ, they have enough of a hard time even getting hard human intel from anywhere anymore--it is all electronic. They have little ability to be a Bilderburg front too.

Maybe a few State Dept guys. Now that is an area that I would believe is totally the center of the NWO, especially with Hillary and the history of diplomatic relations. The Clinton Global Initiative is a front for them and for Bill to have sex with every known prostitute in the world. He is now up to 76,251 whores since leaving office.

You have a State Dept to have diplomatic relations with Haiti, France, South America, African nations, primarily to have sex with the locals and run a front for the drug trade/arms trade for the spooks.

Otherwise, having diplomatic relations with any country is largely a contradiction in terms. Everything important centers around commerce, and not what the fags to to each other or to us. Ony fags read the Economist anyway.

[Heat]

Originally posted by V guy
Does this mean they are against the 2nd amendment, too? Hahahahahhaa!!!

I find it hard to believe that the CIA is running a news front like the Economist.

Christ, they have enough of a hard time even getting hard human intel from anywhere anymore--it is all electronic. They have little ability to be a Bilderburg front too.

Maybe a few State Dept guys. Now that is an area that I would believe is totally the center of the NWO, especially with Hillary and the history of diplomatic relations. The Clinton Global Initiative is a front for them and for Bill to have sex with every known prostitute in the world. He is now up to 76,251 whores since leaving office.

You have a State Dept to have diplomatic relations with Haiti, France, South America, African nations, primarily to have sex with the locals and run a front for the drug trade/arms trade for the spooks.

Otherwise, having diplomatic relations with any country is largely a contradiction in terms. Everything important centers around commerce, and not what the fags to to each other or to us. Ony fags read the Economist anyway.
There is an important saying that you should never underestimate your enemy--chinese origin possibly? Makes sense here--marginalizing the CIA seems pre-mature especially when your criticism stems from a media that the govt controls or strongly influences

[wpsuth]

Moderators, could we please open a specific Black Helicopters/Trilateral Commission/Aluminum Foil Hats forum?

Thank you.

[jaykden]

there is always the conspiracy files in the basement...

my personal opinion is that anything that comes from infowars belongs down there...

been too much tinfoil crap from that website that never panned out.

[JasonB]

Originally posted by jaykden
there is always the conspiracy files in the basement...

my personal opinion is that anything that comes from infowars belongs down there...

been too much tinfoil crap from that website that never panned out.

What did you think about the MIAC story that (IIRC) originated there?

[JasonB]

Originally posted by V guy
Christ, they have enough of a hard time even getting hard human intel from anywhere anymore--it is all electronic.

What makes you think that?

[Munster30]

Originally posted by wpsuth
Moderators, could we please open a specific Black Helicopters/Trilateral Commission/Aluminum Foil Hats forum?

Thank you. It's already Down this way.... (http://www.falfiles.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=1&forumid=46)

[1911guy]

I guess the concept of a "living breathing document that changes with the times" isn't working form them any more. They have to resort to declaring it irrelevant due to time. My position is that if either the Constitution is irrelevant or changes at a whim then all other statutory laws in this country mean whatever I deem them to mean or are themselves irrelevant. If a law is inconsistent then what does it mean? If the supreme written law of the land can be minimized in this way then my position on what constitutes a legal action is just as valid as anyone else.

[Sailor553]

And, here I have been thinking that this agency was chartered to keep an eye on foreign affairs and other agencies to monitor domestic issues. Kinda makes me wonder what verbage is used in today's Oath of Allegience.