View Full Version : ACLU being taken to the wood shed
Yo Quiero FAL
July 05, 2008, 11:29
by there own members! Check it out:
http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/01/heller-decision-and-the-second-amendment/
Maybe they will finally come around and defend and cherish the 2nd amendment as much as they do the others. Bwahaha.
Then again if they are truly just a lefty organization, they will fully support the 2nd A when pigs fly.
Here is one of the posts:
Q: How does the ACLU count to 10?
A: 1 3 4 5 ...... 10
festus
July 05, 2008, 12:06
A.C.L.U. is toast.
They can kiss our collective behinds. What a bunch of losers.
308bolt
July 05, 2008, 12:17
Their position holds them up to the light and shows them for what they really are.
However, much like the Chicago Tribune article, the comments are priceless. http://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/143.gif
HikerLT
July 05, 2008, 12:29
http://blog.aclu.org/2008/07/01/heller-decision-and-the-second-amendment/
interesting comments on the ACLU position working against the contitution Bill of Rights
Lon Moer
July 05, 2008, 12:36
Funny how the "American", "Civil", and "Liberties" parts keep getting in the way of the ACLU.:rofl:
juanni
July 05, 2008, 16:56
Originally posted by 308bolt
However, much like the Chicago Tribune article, the comments are priceless. http://www.websmileys.com/sm/happy/143.gif
Yes they are, and just a quick glance showed the the poster comments were lucid, intelligent and without the typical spelling and grammar errors of most. :smile:
The ACLU will come around, or be sent into credibility wasteland.
..................juanni
longhair51
July 05, 2008, 19:36
I really liked this part of one particular reply....
"After all, all constitutional freedoms have limits. The government needs to have the power to regulate especially dangerous free speech and typewriters that are capable of performing automatic carriage returns (”assault typewriters”)."
:rofl:
Azrial
July 06, 2008, 02:05
A sociality of crack pot leftists.
I have never them seem to think that a traditionally conservative issue was worth fighting for.
fastfreddy
July 06, 2008, 19:04
The ACLU joined with my son and the NRA, as well as the Attorney General of Virginia, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Rutherford Institute in defending his right to wear an NRA shirt to publick skool. Yep, that's a motley crew for sure. Honor demands that I give credit where credit is due. The ACLU amicus brief to the 4th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals was well and strongly worded, with no reservation about freedom of pro-gun speech.
2barearms
July 06, 2008, 19:56
You only have two, that's right two "rights". The first is the right to remain silent, and of course if you give up that right, everything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law, second you have the right to an attorney and of course if you kept your mouth shut during the waterboarding and you can't afford one they'll find some loser schmuck ambulance chaser to have a look at your case. Otherwise there are no real rights.
John Culver
July 06, 2008, 22:44
Originally posted by 2barearms
You only have two, that's right two "rights". The first is the right to remain silent, and of course if you give up that right, everything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law, second you have the right to an attorney and of course if you kept your mouth shut during the waterboarding and you can't afford one they'll find some loser schmuck ambulance chaser to have a look at your case. Otherwise there are no real rights.
Dont we still have the right to BUY justice? or is that to gone?
renaissance_warrior
July 06, 2008, 23:07
Only if you are O.J,. Simpson, Marc Rich Al Sharpton (Twana Brawley slander suit) Keating Five, Enron execs, Ted Kennedy and a few others I can't think of right now. :mad:
fastfreddy
July 07, 2008, 14:14
Technically, you don't always have the right to remain silent. There are circumstances where a judge can order you to answer incriminating questions and refusal results in incarceration until you comply. Just so ya know.
John Culver
July 07, 2008, 14:39
Originally posted by fastfreddy
Technically, you don't always have the right to remain silent. There are circumstances where a judge can order you to answer incriminating questions and refusal results in incarceration until you comply. Just so ya know.
Technically we have a constitution...
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.